In our theory of consumer behavior, we encountered a class of commodities that violates the law of demand: these are called Giffen goods, where the quantity demanded increases as the price increases. The law of demand predicts the opposite: there is an inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded, ceteris paribus. Although consumer theory allows for the possibility of Giffen goods, there is scant empirical support for their existence. Using a standard decomposition technique, illustrate why Giffen goods must necessarily be inferior goods. Discuss your graph in detail. There have been previous attempts at providing empirical support for the existence of Giffen goods. Briefly discuss one or two of them. When asked for examples of Giffen goods, many people suggest luxury items, but these are not technically Giffen goods. They are, in fact, Veblen goods. Critically differentiate between the two types of goods.
Related Posts
Question 1 Janet Brown is 45 and divorced. She has two children who live with her and are dependent on her. Stephen is 12. Sarah is 17 and has been certified as eligible for the disability credit. Janet’s financial information for 2019 and 2020 includes the following: 2020 2019 Salary and taxable benefits $105,000 $100,000 Car expenses deducted in computing employment income
Uncategorized / By
Scenario: You are employed by Pacific IT Solutions as a solutions integrator. Your job description is to implement IT solutions and provide customer support. One of your long-time customers, Western Mining, has their head office in Sydney and is opening a branch office in Brisbane. You have been contracted to setup the network. A meeting has been held to start the project. The minutes of the meeting are as follows:
Uncategorized / By