Sample Answer for NUR 630 Hospital Associated Infections Included After Question
Sample Answer for NUR 630 Hospital Associated Infections Data Included After Question
Benchmark – Hospital-Associated Infections Data
The purpose of this assignment is to examine health care data on hospital-associated infections and determine the best methods for presenting the data to stakeholders. Use the scenario below and the “Hospital Associated Infections Data” Excel spreadsheet to complete the assignment.
Scenario
You have been tasked with displaying Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) hospital quality measures data for a 5-year period on four quality measures at your site. After examining the data, identify trends and determine the best way to present the actionable information to stakeholders.
Assignment
Create a 10-15 slide PowerPoint presenting the data to the stakeholders. Address the following in your PowerPoint:
What conclusions can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period?
What trends do you see for each quality measure over the 5-year period?
When comparing each quality measure, is the quality measure better than, worse than, or no different from the national benchmark over time?
Based on your examination of the data, which of the quality measures should you prioritize and why?
Develop a quality improvement metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and patient experience relating to the identified area of opportunity.
Explain how you would monitor the metric and use collected data for improvement.
Include a title slide, references slide, and comprehensive speaker notes.
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competency:
MSN Emphasis in Leadership in Health Care Systems
6.6 Develop and monitor continuous quality improvement metrics and measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and patient experience.
Attachments NUR-630-RS-HospitalAssociatedInfectionsData.xlsx XXXXXXXXXXXXX PLEASE ACCESS THI ATTACHMENTS INFORMATION
Rubric
Topic 7 Rubric: Benchmark – Hospital Associated Infections Data
No of Criteria: 11 Achievement Levels: 5
Criteria
Achievement Levels
Description
Percentage
1: Unsatisfactory
0.00 %
2: Less Than Satisfactory
80.00 %
3: Satisfactory
88.00 %
4: Good
92.00 %
5: Excellent
100.00 %
Content
100.0
Conclusions
8.0
Conclusions that can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period are not present.
Conclusions that can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period are present, but the conclusions are not supported with data.
Conclusions that can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period are present.
Conclusions that can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period are appropriate. The conclusions are mostly supported with data.
Conclusions that can be drawn for each quality measure over the 5-year period are appropriate. The conclusions are supported by the data.
Trends
8.0
A description of the trends that can be seen in the data is not present.
A description of the trends that can be seen in the data is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
A description of the trends that can be seen in the data is present.
A description of the trends that can be seen in the data is present. The trends discussed are mostly accurate.
A description of the trends that can be seen in the data is present. The trends discussed are accurate.
Quality Measure and National Benchmarks
6.0
A comparison of each quality measure to the national benchmark is not present.
A comparison of each quality measure to the national benchmark is present, but some comparisons are not accurate.
NA
NA
A comparison of each quality measure to the national benchmark is present and all comparisons are accurate.
Prioritization of Quality Measures
6.0
Prioritization of Quality Measures
Prioritization of the quality measures is present, but is not appropriate based on the data.
NA
NA
Prioritization of the quality measures is present and is appropriate based on the data.
Quality Improvement Metric (C6.6)
6.0
A quality improvement metric is not present.
A quality improvement metric is present, but some portions may not be appropriate for the quality measure.
A quality improvement metric is present.
A quality improvement metric is present and detailed. The metric is mostly appropriate for the quality measure.
A quality improvement metric is present and thorough. The metric is appropriate for the quality measure.
Monitoring the Quality Improvement Metric
6.0
An explanation of how to monitor the metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience is not present.
An explanation of how to monitor the metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.
An explanation of how to monitor the metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience is present.
An explanation of how to monitor the metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience is present and detailed.
An explanation of how to monitor the metric and related measures to improve care processes, outcomes, and the patient experience is present and thorough.
Presentation of Content
30.0
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Layout
10.0
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
10.0
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. The writer appears to be unaware of the audience. The use of primer prose indicates the writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Language is appropriate for the targeted audience for the most part.
The writer is clearly aware of the audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.
The writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5.0
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 630 Hospital Associated Infections Data
Title: NUR 630 Hospital Associated Infections Data
Introduction
The promotion of safety, quality and efficiency in patient care is important
Hospital acquired infections threaten safety of patient care
Increases hospital stay and costs of care
Nurses and other healthcare providers play critical roles in their prevention
Selected Indicators
Surgical site infection post-colon surgery
Central-line associated blood stream infections
Surgical site infections from abdominal hysterectomy
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections
5-Year Trend for Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections
2.814 in 2011
0.827 in 2012
Not available in 2013
0.567 in 2014
0.466 in 2015
5-Year Trend for Surgical Site Infections Post-Colon Surgery
0.273 in 2011
0.174 in 2012
2.219 in 2013
2.487 in 2014
3.55 in 2015
5-Year Trend for Central Line-Associated Blood Stream Infections
2.845 in 2011
2.203 in 2012
3.062 in 2013
3.063 in 2014
3.422 in 2015
5-Year Trend for Surgical Site Infections from Abdominal Hysterectomy
1.148 in 2011
2.132 in 2012
2.094 in 2013
3.697 in 2014
4.608 in 2015
National Comparison: Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections
5 Year National5 Year Hospital Rate Observation 20111.87920112.814Worst than 20120.82720120.827Worst than 2013Not available 2013Not available Not available 20141.08920140.567Better than 20151.23120150.466Not different
