In your DNP project, you may implement a change theory to generate the necessary changes on the proposed topic. Prepare a recorded PowerPoint presentation explaining, step by step, the change theory for you selected ( please select the theory), and provide examples of how you would implement it. Develop a SWOT analysis to Identify the strengths and weaknesses of implementing this change.-10 slides ALL NEED TO HAVE SPEAKER NOTES PLEASE- ALL SLIDES NEED HAVE PROPER AMOUNT OF INFORMATION AS THIS IS THE HIGHEST ACADEMIC LEVEL-NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIARISM OR AI TEXT INCLUDING REFERENCES( I NEED BOTH REPORTS PLEASE)-APA 7TH EDITION FORMART IN ALL SLIDES PLEASE, ( VERY IMPORTANT)-Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
- THE assignment will be run through TurnItIn to check for plagiarism and AI text no more than 10% each one.
- Your presentation must be an original work, logically organized, and follow the current APA format, including citation of references.
- Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
DUE DATE OCTOBER 18, 2025
– Official Presentations Rubric – Official Presentations Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pt s
This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Content
40 to >36.0 pts Excellent 100% of the presentation (live or recorded) aligns with the information requested and shows complete mastery of the topic or task by providing comprehensive information, details, and examples. 36 to >32.0 pts Good Most of the presentation (live or recorded) aligns with the information requested and shows complete mastery of the topic or task by providing comprehensive information, details, and examples. 32 to >28.0 pts Fair Some of the presentation (live or recorded) aligns with the information requested and shows fair mastery of the topic or task by providing comprehensive information, details, and examples. 28 to >24.0 pts Poor Most of the presentation (live or recorded) does not align with the information requested. It shows incomplete mastery of the topic or task by providing limited or poor information, details, and examples.
40 pt s
This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Commu nication Oral Present ation, Record ed Narrativ e, or Scripted Notes
20 to >18.0 pts Excellent Oral presentation (live or recorded) is fluid, free of grammatical errors, and well paced. The message is transmitted flawlessly, and the audience is captivated and able to follow the presentation step by step. OR (for non-presented assignments) Script for presentation in the notes is exceptional, effectively tells the story, or communicates key points from the slide. 18 to >16.0 pts Good Oral presentation (live or recorded) has a few grammatical errors or pacing issues. Issues do not interfere with reception of the content. OR (for non- presented assignments) Script for presentation in the notes effectively tells the story or communicates key points from the slide. 16 to >14.0 pts Fair Oral presentation has significant grammatical issues, interfering with the reception of the content OR (for non- presented assignments). Script for presentation reiterates the content on the slide without any additional information. If this was presented, it would appear that the presenter was reading the slides to the audience. OR (for non-presented assignments) Script for presentation in the notes fairly tell the story or communicates basic key points from the slide.
20 pt s
This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Supporti ng Material s and Visual Present ation
30 to >27.0 pts Excellent Presentation has a highly professional, appealing appearance. Supporting visuals may include images, graphs, or charts and are exceptional and appropriate to the message being presented. Slides are well formatted with the proper amount of text, leveraging heading and body styles. The colors and style are consistent throughout. The visuals and the oral message are well- balanced. 27 to >24.0 pts Good Presentation has a professional appearance. Supporting visuals are appropriate to the message being presented. Slides are well formatted with appropriate graphics and font size. The colors and style are consistent throughout. 24 to >21.0 pts Fair Presentation has a professional appearance. Supporting visuals are appropriate to the message being presented. There are some inconsistencies with formatting, colors, and style, but the overall presentation is developing and looks fair. 21 to >18.0 pts Poor
30 pt s
Total Points: 100
This criterion is linked to a Learnin g Outcom e Writing Mechan ics and Gramm ar
10 to >9.0 pts Excellent Slides are entirely free of typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, translation or formatting errors. 9 to >8.0 pts Good Slides have minimal (1 – 3) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 8 to >7.0 pts Fair Slides have multiple (4 -7) typographical, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors. 7 to >6.0 pts Poor Slides have more than severe (8-10) typos, spelling, grammar or translation issues. (A presentation will distract from the message if these issues are present. 6 to >0 pts Unacceptable Slides are unacceptable (11 or more) typographical,
10 pt s