Week 6 Discussion Forum
Burrell, T. (n.d.). Moral Reasoning. [Video]. Canvas@WCU. https://westcoastuniversity.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=248321a6-1a68-4d10-a45c-b1cc00abe1d7
Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involved).
· Which of these theories, if any, do you find most reasonable, and why?
· Provide a clear example to demonstrate your thinking.
In responses to at least two peers, check their work. Were their explanations and examples clear and accurate? Identify any problems/errors in their logic or explain why you agree with their rationale. Make sure your responses are substantive and contribute extra to the discussion.
Please ensure all initial posts are at least 150 words minimum and have 1 APA citation.
Please ensure all peer responses are at least 100 words minimum and have 1 APA citation.
If you use the template from the Doc Sharing forum, please DO NOT upload the template into the discussion. Copy/paste your response from the template into the discussion.
The post Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches first appeared on College Essays Cafe.
