Faculty of Business and Law
Assignment Brief
|
Module Title |
International Business and Strategy |
Assignment Number |
2 |
|
Module Code |
BMIB5001 |
Assignment Title |
Individual Written Essay on ‘Strategy Management Plan’ |
|
Module Leader |
Meera Borsara |
Assignment Weighting |
60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assignment Release Date: |
Monday, 29th September 2025 |
|
|
|
Submission Date/Time: |
Friday, 14th November 2025, 12:00 (noon) |
|
|
|
Assessment Information – What you need to do |
|
This assignment is an individual assignment. You are required to write a 3,000-word strategy plan as if you are a management consultant delivering the plan to the company’s Board of Directors. Your strategy plan must be clear, professional, and supported with analysis and evidence. For an organisation of your choice, you should formulate a strategic change plan either for the operations of an existing international business or for organisation intending to internationalise.The strategic change plan should be based on a detailed strategic audit and evaluation of strategic options. Strong rationale should be provided for the chosen strategic option. Critical evaluation of requirements for implementing the strategic option chosen should also be considered. For instance: issues such as strategic change management, and cross-cultural implications. Your Task You must choose one organisation and develop a strategy plan for one of the following options:
Your 3000 words essay should address the following areas: Introduction
Strategic Audit (External and Internal Analysis) You must analyse both the external and internal environment of the company. Macro-Environmental Analysis (PEST or PESTLE) Use PEST or PESTLE analysis to assess factors influencing the company in the relevant international market. These include:
For each factor:
Industry Analysis (Porter’s Five Forces) Use Porter’s Five Forces to examine the competitive environment:
For each force:
Internal Analysis (VRIO Framework) Use the VRIO model to assess if the company’s resources give it a competitive advantage. Apply the VRIO test to at least 2–3 key resources or capabilities (e.g., brand strength, technology,skilled workforce):
Summarise the competitive advantage:
SWOT Analysis Combine findings from your strategic audit into a SWOT table:
This helps create a clear summary of the company’s current strategic position. Strategic Formulation Based on your strategic audit, propose a set of strategic options (2 or 3) that the company could pursue to either expand internationally or strengthen its existing global position. You must then:
In your evaluation:
Strategic Implementation Once you have recommended the most appropriate strategic option(s), you must develop a realistic and detailed action plan for implementing it. Your implementation plan should include:
You must also:
Discuss possible implementation issues such as:
Conclusion
Reference list
Additional Guidance
Note: This task simulates real-world consulting work. You may not have perfect information – make logical assumptions and show clear reasoning in your analysis. Please use the structure below to articulate your company’s Strategy Plan: 1.0. Introduction 2.0. Strategic Audit 2.1. Macro-Environmental Analysis 2.1.1. Political Factors 2.1.2. Economic Factors 2.1.3. Socio-Cultural Factors 2.1.4. Technological Factors 2.2. Industrial Analysis (i.e Porter’s five forces). 2.2.1. Bargaining power of customers/ threat of substitute products/ competitive rivalry 2.2.2. Bargaining power of suppliers/ Threat of new entrants. 2.3. Internal Analysis 2.3.1. VRIO Analysis 2.3.2. SWOT Analysis 3.0. Strategic Formulation 3.1. How to Compete 3.2. Strategic Change Options 3.3. Method of Growth 3.4. Evaluation of the Strategic Options 4.0. Strategic Implementation 5.0. Conclusion 6.0. Reference List Details regarding each of the elements above will be discussed in the weekly seminar and lecture sessions. |
|
Criteria for Assessment – How you will be marked |
|||||||||||||||
|
The individual written essay will be marked according to specific criteria (see table below). A marking rubric, detailing how each of the assessment criteria will be assessed is provided on Learning Zone, under the Assessment 2 tab. Note that there will be time in seminars to discuss the assessment task, including marking criteria, in more depth.
Please, have a look at the marking rubric for more detailed information (separate document). Further information on University mark descriptors can be found here. This assignment is designed to assess the following learning outcomes: 1. Conceptualise and critically evaluate why and how firms go international. 2. Critically appraise what is strategy and use academic scholarship to assess how firms make and implement strategy. 3. Critically evaluate the underlying drivers of value creation to inform in international business strategy. 4. Critically appraise the host and home country factors that affect the development and implementation of international business strategies to inform proposed solutions. 5. Develop a conceptual framework for tackling the opportunities and challenges in international business. |
|
Assessment Details:
How to Submit Your Assessment The assessment must be submitted by 12:00 noon (GMT) on 14/11/2025. No paper copies are required. You can access the submission link through the module shell.
Checks will be made on your work using anti-plagiarism software and approved plagiarism checking websites. |
|
Return of Marked Work You can expect to have feedback returned to you on 05/12/2025. If for any reason, there is a delay you will be kept informed. Marks and feedback will be provided online. It is important that you access the feedback you receive as this will help to make improvements to your later work, you can request a meeting with your Module Leader or Personal Tutor to discuss your feedback in more detail. Marks will have been internally moderated only and will therefore be provisional; your mark will be formally agreed later in the year once the external examiner has completed their review. More information on assessment and feedback can be found here. |
|
Academic Integrity and Generative AI Use In submitting a piece of work for assessment it is essential that you understand the University`s requirements for maintaining academic integrity and ensure that the work does not contravene University regulations. Some examples of behaviour that would not be considered acceptable include plagiarism, re-use of previously assessed work, collusion with others and purchasing your assignment from a third party. For more information on academic offences, bad academic practice, and academic penalties, please read the University’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy. Generative AI tools cannot be used for this assessment. You must not use generative artificial intelligence (AI) to generate any materials or content in relation to your assessment. |
|
Academic Support and Your Well-being Referencing is the process of acknowledging other people’s work when you have used it in your assignment or research. It allows the reader to locate your source material as quickly and easily as possible so that they can read these sources themselves and verify the validity of your arguments. Referencing provides the link between what you write and the evidence on which it is based. You identify the sources that you have used by citing them in the text of your assignment (called citations or in-text citations) and referencing them at the end of your assignment (called the reference list or end-text citations). The reference list only includes the sources cited in your text. The main referencing guide can be found here and includes information on the basics of referencing and achieving good academic practice. It also has tabs for the specific referencing styles depending on whether you require Harvard style used in business or OSCOLA style used by the Law school. The University has a wealth of support services available to students; further information can be obtain |
