You have encountered various theories of knowledge and theories of being in this course, beginning with Plato/Socrates (as well as pre- Socratics like Parmenides), Descartes and the rationalists, empiricism, and Kantian constructivi

Assignment
Directions: 

Goal:  A deeper
understanding of the chosen topic.

While some Assignments can be a bit
more creative, learning how to improve your skills with written communication
is also a good thing. Toward that end, the goal here is to write a paper of
between 500-750 words on one of the three options below:

  • Use one or more moral
    theories from weeks 6 and 7 to justify what you believe is the right
    thing to do concerning some contemporary situation.
    • Define
      and describe the theories you use.
    • Describe
      the contemporary moral situation and why it is a moral situation.
    • Describe
      how the theory provides the reasoning/justification to demonstrate your
      proposed solution is the best one.
  • You have encountered
    various theories of knowledge and theories of being in this course,
    beginning with Plato/Socrates (as well as pre-Socratics like
    Parmenides), Descartes and the rationalists, empiricism, and Kantian constructivism.
    The phenomenological method, as described in Week 7, can also give us
    tools for a theory of knowledge. Use one or more theories from
    epistemology and/or metaphysics to discuss what kinds of things you can
    know and how you can claim to know what you know.
    • Define
      and describe the theory or theories that you use to make your claim.
    • Say
      something about the range of possible knowledge that you can
      legitimately claim as knowledge. That is, does it include only
      knowledge of what can be sensed and whatever is physical? Or can we
      know abstract objects like universals? Can we have knowledge of more
      spiritual or esoteric realities, like the soul, God, religious
      doctrines, etc.? 
    • Explain
      the reasons that support your viewpoint by providing arguments that are
      in dialogue with relevant thinkers discussed in our course.
  • Use one or more theories
    from weeks 3-5 and 8 to demonstrate humans have a purpose.
    • Define
      and describe the theory or theories you use to make your claim.
    • Keep in
      mind that the goal is to argue humans have a purpose. If you do not
      think we have one, consider another option.
    • Be sure
      your argument includes like-minded philosophers on the type of purpose
      you claim humans have.

Submission
Instructions: 

  • Your paper will be
    written at a college level with an introduction 
    (one that
    states an argumentative/interpretive thesis and that indicates what
    would be covered and in what order)
    , body paragraphs, a conclusion, along with
    in-text citations/Works Cited page in MLA, Turabian, Chicago, or APA formatting.
  • Remember—any resource
    that is listed on the Works Cited page must have an in-text citation in
    the paper to match, or this is considered plagiarism. [Note: MLA style
    is preferred, but depending on your degree area, you may be more
    familiar with APA or one of the other styles. You can use any approved
    style; just be consistent.] 
  • All papers must be
    double-spaced with one-inch margins on all four (4) sides
    .
  • Using one of the
    templates below is strongly encouraged. Please note that 25 points are
    directly tied to "digital literacy" and "works
    cited" – see the rubric.
  • You may only submit files
    compatible with the Turnitin system.  Please use MS Word.