In this assessment, you will develop a professional Classroom Management Plan that connects observed classroom practice with institutional expectations, designed for a specific group of students.
Assessment Brief 1
EDUC3032 Classroom Management
| Unit Code and Title | EDUC3032 Classroom Management |
| Assessment Number | Assessment 1 |
| Assessment Type | Written Classroom Management Plan |
| Due Date | Week 3, Sunday 24th May, 11:59pm (AEST) |
| Grades Release | Week 4, Sunday 31st May, 11:59pm (AEST) |
| Weight | 50% |
| Length / Duration | 1500 words |
| Individual / Group | Individual |
| Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs) | This assessment evaluates your achievement of the following Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO 1, ULO 2, ULO4 |
Task Overview
In this assessment, you will develop a professional Classroom Management Plan that connects observed classroom practice with institutional expectations, designed for a specific group of students.
You will begin by selecting one of two videos, one set in a primary school context, and one set in a secondary school context. Links to both videos are provided in Step 4 of this task brief. Select the video that best reflects your teaching context. You will then carefully observe your chosen video and critically analyse the teacher's strategies across seven focus areas, identifying what the teacher does, interpreting why, and considering its impact on students. Using this observational evidence alongside the supplied class scenario, you will design and evaluate a practical classroom management plan for your own teaching context.
For each focus area, you must decide whether to adopt the observed strategy, adapt it for your context, or change it, and justify your decision by integrating relevant classroom management theory, institutional policy, and the needs of the students in your scenario. Your plan must demonstrate knowledge of relevant institutional policies and classroom management theory and explain how these inform and shape your behaviour management decisions and classroom practices.
Your plan must demonstrate how observed practice, relevant classroom management theories, and institutional policy expectations, such as safety, inclusion, and wellbeing, inform a safe, predictable, and resilient learning environment.
Rationale
Developing the capacity to plan for effective classroom management is a critical professional skill for beginning teachers. This assessment provides an opportunity to analyse authentic classroom practice and apply key classroom management concepts to a realistic teaching scenario. By observing and interpreting strategies used in the classroom video, you will examine how teachers establish routines, communicate expectations, build positive relationships, and create safe and supportive learning environments that promote student engagement and wellbeing.
The task requires you to connect theory, institutional policy, and observed practice to design a practical Classroom Management Plan for a diverse class context. Through this process, you will demonstrate your understanding of proactive behaviour management, inclusive practice, and the use of structured routines and strategies that support positive learning behaviours, developing the knowledge and skills addressed in the Unit Learning Outcomes.
The scenario-based approach encourages you to consider how classroom management decisions must respond to the needs of all learners, including students requiring targeted or intensive support, and how proactive processes foster student engagement, self-regulation, and cooperation. The Classroom Management Plan you produce may also serve as a useful professional resource, supporting your development as a reflective practitioner and contributing to your future teaching portfolio.
Resources
To complete this task, you will need access to the following resources:
- Classroom video: Two classroom videos are provided in the links below. One set in a primary school context, and one set in a secondary school context. Select the video that best reflects your intended teaching context and watch it in full. Note timestamped examples for each focus area.
Primary classroom video: Task 1 Primary Literacy Review.mp4 (sign in with your SCU account to access)
Secondary classroom video: Task 1 Secondary Year 10 Geography.mp4 (sign in with your SCU account to access)
- Unit readings and lecture materials: These provide the classroom management theories and whole person approaches you will reference in your plan.
- Relevant education policy documents: For example, NSW Department of Education policies relating to behaviour, wellbeing, or inclusion.
- APA 7th edition referencing guide: Available through the SCU Library website.
Instructions for Writing Your Classroom Management Plan
Using the classroom video and the class scenario provided, write a professional Classroom Management Plan in continuous prose. Your plan must follow the seven focus area headings listed below. Do not use dot points or tables. Use academic writing conventions and APA 7th edition referencing throughout.
Your Classroom Management Plan must be 1500 words (±10%), including a brief introduction and conclusion and excluding the reference list. Each focus area should be approximately 200 words.
Step 1: Review the School and Class Context
Before you begin planning, carefully review the school and class context. Your Classroom Management Plan must be designed for the class and students described below. Generic strategies that could apply to any classroom will not meet the required standard. You must specifically refer to Marcus and Lily where relevant across your plan.
School Context
You are a classroom teacher at a government school in NSW that implements a Positive Behaviour for Learning (PBL) framework, with the three core expectations: Be Safe, Be Respectful, Be a Learner. The school community is culturally and linguistically diverse and follows the NSW Department of Education’s policies related to student behaviour, wellbeing, and inclusion.
Class Context – 25 Students
Your class includes students from a range of cultural and linguistic backgrounds, with approximately one-third speaking a language other than English at home. The school draws from a low-to-mid socioeconomic area and participates in the Nationally Consistent Collection of Data (NCCD). Most students are settled and responsive to consistent routines, though five students require varying levels of additional support.
Step 2: Review Focus Students and Multi-Tiered System of Support Levels
Student Context – Focus Students
For this assessment, you will focus on two students, Marcus and Lily, whose profiles are provided in the table below.
| Student | Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) | Profile |
| Marcus | Tier 2 | Marcus has difficulty sustaining attention during extended seated tasks. He frequently calls out, leaves his seat, and distracts nearby students. He is on a Tier 2 check-in/check-out (CICO) monitoring plan reviewed daily with his teacher. No diagnosis: parents are informed and supportive. |
| Lily | Tier 3 | Lily has a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (Level 1) and an Individual Education Plan (IEP). She finds unstructured transitions highly distressing and responds to unexpected changes with withdrawal or refusal. Lily works well in structured, predictable tasks but becomes overwhelmed in noisy group activities. |
Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)
Your plan should demonstrate strategies at different levels of support.
| Tier | What This Means in Your Plan | Students |
| Tier 1: Universal | Foundational strategies for ALL 25 students, routines, expectations, instruction, and environment every student experiences. | All students |
| Tier 2: Targeted | Additional support built into your plan. For example: movement breaks, structured task sequences, daily check-ins. | Marcus |
| Tier 3: Intensive | Individualised support embedded in your plan. For example: visual schedules, advance warning of transitions, sensory adjustments. | Lily |
Note: At the start of your plan, clearly state your chosen year level, subject area, and school context (early childhood, primary or secondary school setting).
Step 3: Understand the Seven Focus Areas
Before watching the classroom video, review the seven focus areas that will guide your observations, analysis, and planning. Each focus area should be addressed in approximately 200 words.
| # | Focus Area | What to Address | MTSS Connection | Descriptor |
| 1 | Routines and Transitions | How will you use routines and transitions to maximise learning time, maintain focus, and create predictability? Include any adaptations for Marcus or Lily. | Tier 1 foundation for all students. Tier 3: advance transition warnings for Lily. | Your analysis must clearly identify and explain how the teacher uses routines and transitions to maximise learning time and maintain student focus. This should include how these routines help maintain clear expectations for behaviour and support positive student engagement, drawing on specific examples from the video. |
| 2 | Explicit Teaching and Reinforcement of Expectations | How will you explicitly teach and reinforce behaviour expectations? How will you differentiate this for students requiring additional support? | Tier 1 for all. Tier 2: additional reminders and prompts for Marcus. | Your response must include an analysis of how the teacher clearly communicates expectations for behaviour and ensures students understand them. This should explain how these expectations are consistently reinforced over time, using strategies such as direct instruction, modelling, or reminders. |
| 3 | Effective Instruction and Feedback | How will your instruction and feedback strategies support all learners? How will you reduce cognitive load, maintain student engagement, and encourage active participation during learning activities? | Tier 1 for all. Tier 2/3: targeted feedback and task adjustments for Marcus and Lily. | You must explain how the teacher uses clear instructions, effective questioning, and specific feedback to support student engagement and understanding. Your analysis should highlight how these strategies maintain focus, prevent confusion, and reduce cognitive load. |
| 4 | Positive Relationships and Classroom Climate | How will you build and maintain positive relationships and a supportive classroom climate, including for students with identified needs? | Tier 1 for all. Tier 2: rapport-building check-ins for Marcus. Tier 3: trusted adult relationship for Lily. | Your analysis must explain how the teacher builds positive relationships with students, using respectful communication, maintaining a calm and supportive tone, and acknowledging student efforts. You should highlight how these positive interactions support student motivation, confidence, and positive behaviour. |
| 5 | Modelling Desired Behaviours | How does your professional conduct serve as a proactive management tool? How does modelling help students understand and adopt positive behaviours? | Tier 1 for all. Consider how modelling explicit expectations supports Marcus and Lily. | Your response must describe how the teacher demonstrates and models the behaviour they expect from students. Your analysis should explain how this modelling helps students understand and adopt positive behaviours, making expectations clear and consistent. |
| 6 | Proactive Behaviour Management | What proactive strategies will you use to prevent disruption and support sustained student engagement through clear routines, structured activities, and active participation in learning? Include any targeted monitoring or individualised support for Marcus and Lily. Where appropriate, explain how these proactive strategies support student engagement, cooperation, and the development of self-regulation. | Tier 1 for all. Tier 2: CICO check-ins for Marcus. Tier 3: structured predictability for Lily. | Your analysis must show how the teacher uses proactive strategies, such as pre-corrections, reminders, and calm redirections, to maintain focus and prevent misbehaviour. You should explain how these strategies maintain a positive and focused learning environment. |
| 7 | Creating a Safe and Predictable Environment | How will you design the physical environment to be safe, predictable, and accessible? Include any environmental adjustments for Lily or Marcus. | Tier 1 for all. Tier 3: physical and sensory adjustments for Lily. | Your response must describe how the teacher maintains a consistent and predictable classroom environment, including clear rules, logical room arrangements, and consistent use of materials. Your analysis should explain how these choices help students feel safe, confident, and ready to learn, promoting a structured and supportive learning space. |
Step 4: Watch the Classroom Video
Two classroom videos are provided in the links below. One set in a primary school context, and one set in a secondary school context. Select that video that best reflects your intended teaching context and watch it in full.
- Primary classroom video: Task 1 Primary Literacy Review.mp4 (sign in with your SCU account to access)
- Secondary classroom video: Task 1 Secondary Year 10 Geography.mp4 (sign in with your SCU account to access)
As you watch the video:
- For each focus area, identify a moment where the teacher demonstrates a relevant strategy.
- Note the timestamp for each example (for example, 4:12 or 4:12–4:45).
- Consider the impact of each strategy on student behaviour, engagement, and learning.
These timestamped observations will form the evidence base for your analysis and planning.
Step 5: Analyse and Apply Strategies
For each focus area:
- Record your timestamped observation, describing what the teacher did and its impact on students.
- Decide whether you will:
o Adopt: Use the same strategy because it suits your school and class context
o Adapt: Modify it to better suit your class, Marcus, or Lily
o Change: Use a different strategy because the observed approach is not suitable, explaining why
- Outline your strategy, ensuring you:
o Justify it with at least one policy and one theory and/or whole-person approach
o Explain how it supports Marcus (Tier 2) and/or Lily (Tier 3) if relevant
Step 6: Write Your Plan Using the Seven Focus Areas
Each focus area should be addressed in continuous prose (approximately 200 words each). Include timestamps from the video where relevant. Connect your strategies to the students’ needs where appropriate. Maintain a professional academic style with APA 7th edition referencing.
Step 7: Conclusion
End your plan with a brief conclusion (3–5 sentences) that summarises how your Classroom Management Plan supports positive behaviour, student engagement, and maintains a safe and inclusive learning environment.
Presentation Requirements
- Written in continuous prose using the seven focus area headings
- Approximately 1500 words, including the introduction and conclusion (excluding references)
- APA 7th edition referencing throughout
- At least one policy document referenced across the plan
- At least one classroom management theory or whole-person approach referenced across the plan
- Timestamps from the video cited where relevant
- Professional academic writing style
Referencing
You are required to use APA 7. Refer to the SCU Library Guides for further guidance.
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Guidelines
This assessment is classified as GenAI use Level 2: May be used for specific assessment tasks or purposes as identified and scaffolded by the Unit Assessor.
- ✅ You may use GenAI to research topics, generate ideas, and develop an outline. Acknowledge this use.
- ✅ You may use GenAI tools such as Copilot and Grammarly for grammar and readability checking. Acknowledge this use.
- ❌ You may not use GenAI to write your assessment or produce your submission.
For further information see Generative AI for Students.
GenAI Declaration
You must include one of the following statements with your assessment submission:
If you DID use GenAI, include this statement:
I acknowledge that I have used Generative AI tools to complete this assessment in accordance with the conditions outlined in the Assessment Brief. I used [insert name of GenAI tool(s)] to [briefly describe how the tool(s) were used, e.g., generate ideas, check grammar, develop an outline].
If you DID NOT use GenAI, include this statement:
I acknowledge that I have not knowingly used GenAI to complete this assessment.
Note: The Unit Assessor may ask you to explain or demonstrate how GenAI tools were used and how your use complied with the assessment guidelines. Please ensure you are prepared to discuss this if requested.
Submissions
You must submit the following item(s):
- Submit your assessment via the Assessment Tasks & Submission area on the Blackboard unit site. Follow the on-screen instructions to upload your file(s).
- 1500 Word Classroom Management Plan as a Word document to Turnitin via the Assessment portal. Include a Cover page at the start of your document, and a reference list at the end of your document.
- A penalty of 5% of the available marks will be deducted from the actual mark at one minute after the due date. A further 5% will be deducted for each subsequent calendar day until the mark reaches zero. Refer to the Assessment, Teaching and Learning Procedures, Section 4 for more information.
All submissions must be clearly labelled. Include the unit code, assessment number, full name, student ID. For example, EDUC3032_A1_FullName_ID123456.
If you are unsure how to submit an item, refer the following support resources: SCU How To Guide: How to Submit an Assignment in Turnitin in Blackboard Ultra for Students
Rules Relating to Assessment and Examination
For information regarding extensions, special consideration, late submissions, resubmissions, grades, appeals, and academic integrity, refer to:
- Rules Relating to Awards — Rule 3 — Coursework Awards — Student Assessment and Examinations
- How to apply for Special Consideration
- Final Grades
Academic Integrity Declaration
By submitting this assessment, I declare that:
I have read and understood SCU’s Academic Integrity policies and referencing guidelines. I am aware of the consequences of academic misconduct and confirm that this submission is my own original work, referenced appropriately, and has not been previously submitted. I authorize its reproduction for authentication purposes and understand the implications of a false declaration. I have adhered to guidelines regarding Generative AI.
Assessment Criteria
| Criteria | High Distinction (HD) 85-100% | Distinction (D) 75-84% | Credit (C) 65-74% | Pass (P) 50-64% | Fail (F) Below 50% |
| Classroom Management Plan 40% ULO 1, ULO 2 | Plan is expertly crafted across all seven focus areas. Video observations, policy, and theory are critically evaluated and seamlessly integrated. Each strategy is analytically justified and clearly supports student engagement and participation in learning activities. | Plan is well-developed across all seven focus areas. Video observations, policy, and theory are evaluated and clearly integrated throughout with strong analytical justification. | Plan is adequately developed across all seven focus areas. Some analysis and evaluation of video observations, policy, and theory is evident. Some areas may lack depth or specificity. | Plan addresses all seven focus areas at a basic level. Video observations, policy, and theory are present but may be loosely integrated or unevenly connected to practice. | Plan is incomplete or does not address the class scenario. Fewer than five focus areas are addressed. Video observations, policy, and theory are largely absent or not meaningfully applied. |
| Tiered Support and Inclusive Practice 30% ULO 2, ULO 4 | MTSS is applied with precision and critically evaluated. Universal strategies are analysed for their effectiveness. Targeted support for Marcus and intensive support for Lily are evaluated against their profiles and relevant policy and purposefully embedded across the plan. | MTSS is applied and evaluated clearly across all three tiers. Universal strategies are analysed. Support for Marcus and Lily is well-reasoned and evaluated against their individual contexts. | MTSS is applied coherently across the three tiers within an inclusive practice framework. Universal strategies address the needs of all students and reflect a whole-person approach to classroom management. Targeted support for Marcus and intensive support for Lily is present and responsive to their student profiles. | MTSS is referenced. Basic support for Marcus and Lily is present. Universal strategies are identified but may be underdeveloped. | MTSS is absent or mentioned only superficially. Support for Marcus and Lily is absent or not responsive to their profiles. |
| Proactive Strategies, Engagement and Self-Regulation 20% ULO 4 | Proactive processes for engagement, self-regulation, and cooperation are purposefully embedded and critically evaluated across the plan. Strategies are analytically justified and show sophisticated understanding of how proactive management prevents disruption and sustains learning. | Proactive processes for engagement, self-regulation, and cooperation are clearly applied across the plan. Strategies show clear understanding of how they prevent disruption and support sustained engagement. | Proactive strategies for student engagement and self-regulation are present across the plan. Strategies are identified and applied with some justification of how they support positive learning behaviour and prevent disruption. | Some proactive strategies are present but basic or inconsistently applied. The connection to self-regulation or cooperation may be limited or unclear. | Proactive strategies are absent or not meaningfully applied. No clear connection to preventing disruption or supporting learning behaviour is evident. |