A comparative study- diagnostic comparison between ERCP MRCP and EUS using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity measures (if possible add additional measures such as positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV)
Comparison between ERCP MRCP and EUS using accuracy
A comparative study- diagnostic comparison between ERCP MRCP and EUS using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity measures (if possible add additional measures such as positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV))
Aim- to address the potentially accurate and safer alternative modalities (MRCP and EUS) by underlining the significant ionizing radiation risks to patients and stuff IN ERCP.
Introduction-
Firstly, mainly about the somatic risks and deterministic injuries regarding interventional radiological (IR) procedures, ERCP.
Secondly, lack of clear Guidelines and regulations for standard radiation exposure
Further, Advantages of ERCP in therapeutic procedures
Additionally, role of MRCP and EUS
Methodology meta-analysis using PUBMED ScienceDirect, GIE journal (Gastrointestinal Endoscopy), cochrane library
Articles published after 2008
Flowchart of selection process
Doesn’t matter if articles are randomized studies(RS) or non-randomized articles(NRS), but please add why you choice(RS/NRS) one over the other.
Discuss articles that contain comparison of the three modalities (ERCP vs MRCP vs EUS) with additional articles that compare (ERCP VS MRCP) & (ERCP Vs EUS) in conjunction with few aetiology (preferably one main pathology to compare these modalities, with additional pathologies to accommodate literature)
Attachments
Click Here To Download
The post Comparison between ERCP MRCP and EUS using accuracy appeared first on AssignmentHub.
