persuade and provide legal defence according to UK law( Must referees to UK case law). The argument should be well structured and focused arguments. All data/information must be justified and referen

persuade and provide legal defence according to UK law( Must referees to UK case law). The argument should be well structured and focused arguments. All data/information must be justified and referenced as must the theory. The task should cover two topics and according to the defined position : • Topic A: The law on Non-Fatal Offences. The law is satisfactory and rational (Arguments should be for this sentence) • Topic B: The law on Theft , should be reformed. (Arguments should be for this sentence) The structure should be aligned with the following and should be done in two versions for topic A and topic B according : • Introduction ( about the topic) o Summary that include Stand/position ( for each of the above topic) : that include example the law is satisfactory and rational o Brief introduction to the topic : eg. definition of non-fatal offe​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‍‍​nces, types of non-fatal offences covered here etc • Summary: o 1. Repeat Stand o 2. Reasons (main points) for the stand • Skeleton/Main Arguments (Must referees to UK case law ) o (example) 1. The law on non-fatal offences recognises the significance of mental harm. The law on non fatal offences recognises mental harm (R v Ireland (1981) in the offences of assault, etc (Martin, 2017) 2. …. • Conclusion • Recommendations • Reference List The References list ( initial that should be extended beyond the below) and should use the Harvard System of Referencing: • Jacqueline Martin, Criminal Law (2016), Hodder Press • Jonathan Herring, Criminal Law (2017), Oxford Publishing • Gardner, Rationality & the Rule of Law in Offences Against the Person (1994) Cambridge Law Journal 502 • Ashworth and Mitchell, Rethinking English Homicide Law, (200​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌‍‍​0), Oxford University Press