Assignment Question
Task 1 – 500 words
Identify and explain models of reflection used in health and social care.
1.1: Identify two models of reflection commonly used in health and social care practice.
1.2: Explain the benefits to health and social care practitioners of reflective practice.
Assessment Criteria
1.1: Identify 2 models of reflection commonly used in health and social care practice.
1.2: Explain the benefits of reflective practice in health and social care.
Task 2 – 900 words
Develop the skills and knowledge required to plan for your personal and professional development.
2.1: Discuss how personal development plans are used in health and social care practice.
2.2: Develop a personal development plan:
- Establish your purpose or direction
- Identify development needs
- Identify learning opportunities
- Formulate an action plan
- Undertake the development
- Record the outcomes
- Evaluate and review
Assessment Criteria
2.1: Demonstrate an understanding of the use of personal development plans.
2.2: Discuss how personal development plans are used in health and social care practice.
2.3: Explain the role of clinical supervision in health and social care.
3.1: Develop a personal development plan.
3.2: Identify on the plan your aims, how to achieve, success criteria and how you will monitor if achieved.
Task 3 – 600 words
Discuss the links between theory and practice and how this can be facilitated.
3.1: Discuss how to facilitate the use of research in practice.
- What are its benefits?
- What are the potential barriers to implementation of research into practice?
Assessment Criteria
4.1: Discuss how to facilitate the use of research in practice and its benefits.
4.2: Discuss the potential barriers to implementation of research into practice.
Do You Need Assignment of This Question
| Criteria | Distinguished (80+) | Excellent (70) | Good (60) | Proficient (50) | Basic (40) | Marginal (30) | Unacceptable (0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content (alignment with assessment criteria) | Extensive evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes substantial original thinking | Comprehensive critical evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes coherent original thinking | Adequate evaluation and synthesis of key ideas beyond basic descriptions; includes original thinking | Describes main ideas with evidence of evaluation; includes some original thinking | Describes some of the main ideas but omits some concepts; limited evidence of evaluation; confused original thinking | Largely incomplete description of main issues; misses key concepts; no original thinking | Inadequate information or containing information not relevant to the topic |
| Application of Theory and Literature | In-depth, detailed and relevant application of theory; expertly integrates literature to support ideas and concept | Clear and relevant application of theory; fully integrates literature to support ideas and concepts | Appropriate application of theory; integrates literature to support ideas and concepts | Adequate application of theory; uses literature to support ideas and concepts | Limited application of theory; refers to literature but may not use it consistently | Confused application of theory; does not use literature for support | Little or no evidence of application of theory and relevant literature |
| Knowledge and Understanding | Extensive depth of understanding and exploration beyond key principles and concepts | Comprehensive knowledge and depth of understanding key principles and concepts | Sound understanding of principles and concepts | Basic knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles | Limited and superficial knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles | Confused or inadequate knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles | Little or no evidence of knowledge or understanding of key concepts and principles |
| Presentation and Writing Skills | Logical, coherent and polished presentation exceeding expectations at this level; free from errors in mechanics and syntax | Logical, coherent presentation demonstrating mastery; free from errors in mechanics and syntax | Logical structure to presentation; makes few errors in mechanics and syntax which do not prohibit meaning | Orderly presentation; minor errors in mechanics and syntax | Somewhat weak presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax may interfere with meaning | Confused presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax often interfere with meaning | Illogical presentation lacking cohesion; contains significant errors that interfere with meaning |
| Referencing | Advanced use of in-text citation and references | Mastery of in-text citation and referencing | Appropriate use of in-text citation and referencing | Adequate use of in-text citation and referencing | Limited use of in-text citation and referencing | Inadequate use of citation and referencing | Little or no evidence of appropriate referencing or use of sources |
Buy Answer of This Assessment & Raise Your Grades
The post HSC404 Reflective Practice Assignment: Identifying Reflection Models, Creating Personal and Professional Development Plans, and Linking Theory to Practice in Health and Social Care appeared first on Students Assignment Help UK.