MM305M4: Competency Assessment
Rubric
Criteria
Met
Not yet met
Identify decision theory terms.
[Identify factors in a decision-making environment]
Describe decision environments using decision tables or trees.
[Interpret decisions made under uncertainty.]
Interpret decisions made under risk.
Calculate the EMV and EVPI for decision strategies.
Total
The criterion statements in Bold are the minimum requirement to show competent performance on the course outcome; all Bold criteria must be met to pass this course outcome. A “Met” mark for Bold criterion is awarded for certification in the associated lesson(s).
The criterion statements in [Brackets] represent mastery achievement. A predefined number of mastery criteria must be achieved to earn an A grade, indicating mastery of the course outcome. A “Met” mark for [Brackets] criterion is awarded by demonstrating competent performance in part 2 of the assessment.
For the written portion, students are to submit a word document and/or Excel workbook(s) that clearly demonstrate the student is able to solve each problem appropriately. All problems and work must be clearly labeled on the word document and/or Excel workbook(s) submitted. Standard English with appropriate punctuation and grammar should be used.
CLA and Grade Criteria Chart
Criteria
CLA Score
Grade
Points
Meets all criterion and at least 1 mastery criterion
5
A
1,000
Meets at all bold criterion and no mastery criterion
4
B
850
Meets 3 bold criterion
3
(not yet competent)
F at term end
0
Meets 2 bold criterion
2
(not yet competent)
F at term end
0
Meets 1 bold criterion
1
(not yet competent)
F at term end
0
Meets 0 of the bold criterion
0
(not yet competent) F at term end
0
No work submitted.
N/A
(not yet competent) F at term end
0
The post MM305M4: Competency Assessment Rubric Criteria Met Not yet met Identify decision theory appeared first on PapersSpot.
