n this assessment you are required you to write a report based on the case scenario which appears on the NRS275 nteract2 site within the Assessment item 2 tab. Using the case scenario please address:
1) The value assumptions that are evident in the case study; and
2) How the principles of transpersonal caring can be applied to improve the interactions in the scenario.
lease structure your report as follows:
ntroduction (approximately 150 words):
nclude an introduction that sets out the overall structure of the report and outlines the value assumptions evident in
he case scenario.
Question One (approx. 750 words):
Provide an explanation of the value assumptions that are evident in the case study.
Question Two (approx. 750 words):
escribe how the principles of transpersonal caring can be applied to improve the interactions in the scenario.
onclusion (approximately 150 words):
nclude a conclusion that describes how the principles of transpersonal caring address the identified value
ssumptions, thus improving the interactions in the case scenario.
n your essay you should:
Response to questions must be provided in full sentences without informal language and jargon and referenced accurately.
Do not use dot points
Use only current scholarly sources for this assessment task. (e.g. the current edition of a textbook not more than 5
(five) years old and peer – reviewed journal articles not more than ten (10) years old).
Dot com (.com) websites and blogs are not suitable for academic work and will not be recognised as credible references. General web searches will not provide you with information of sufficient quality to pass this assessment.
Please use the CSU library search (CINHAL, EBSCOhost, ProQuest, PubMed) engines to access information. APA 7th edition conventions should be used for in text citations and in the reference list.
ou must support your paper with a minimum of 12 recent (less than 7 years old) and credible sources. All intext itations are included in the word count. 50% of your sources should be peer-reviewed journal articles. You should upport your paper with a combination of the following credible sources:
Peer-reviewed journal articles (these are the highest quality sources);
Textbooks (Including, but not limited to your prescribed texts for this subject).
he paper is a piece of academic writing and should therefore adhere to academic writing conventions. Full sentences nd paragraphs, spelling and grammar should be thoughtfully constructed throughout.
ub-headings are acceptable. Dot points, tables, lists, colloquial language and shorthand are NOT acceptable.
Case Study John – Assessment Two
ase Study John – Assessment Two – Value Assumptions and Transpersonal Teaching
You are a second year student nurse on placement in an aged care facility dementia unit and have been asked to omplete an assessment on John. John has been living in the facility for two years and was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s ementia five years ago. As you review John’s care plan you note that John was a talented actor and worked in some amous movies in Australia. You also note that John now has difficulty with speech and writing (aphasia) and short term
memory loss. It has been identified in the care plan that John is at times aggressive with staff, does not like moving
rom his chair and refuses to leave his room.
ou approach John in his room with some trepidation and explain to him that you would like to complete an
ssessment. You notice that he looks frightened when you speak to him and as you approach John he becomes very gitated and yells at you to leave the room. You decide to speak with the Registered Nurse (RN) who is in charge of the ementia unit that day.
When you explain what has happened to the RN she asks you whether you have reflected on the implications for John of is aphasia and short term memory loss and what it might mean for his ability to understand others and communicate. he also asks about whether you have reflected on the value assumptions as described by Watson’s caring science, efore approaching John. She explains that this is particularly relevant for John’s safety and well-being.
he registered nurse then asks you to reflect on the principles of transpersonal teaching, and in particular Principle 7: romotion of a transpersonal teaching and learning. She suggests that when you next approach John to base your
nteraction on an understanding of these principles as a person with unique needs, and as a basis for ethical, person entred care in practice.
ou spend some time preparing to approach John again, but this time calmly, with a caring attitude and a focus on a aring-healing modality. After you have introduced yourself to John and asked for his permission to enter his room, you
hare with him your love of movies and refer to his photos on the wall. As he starts to chat you notice he has stiffness in is legs and arms. You ask him if he would like a heat pack and massage as a way to relieve his discomfort. He agrees to
heat pack but continues to ask who you are and what you are doing in his room.
Rubric For Assessment 2
Criteria High Distinction (85-100%) Distinction (75-84.5%) Credit (65-74.5%) Pass (50-64.5%)
Inclusion of an introduction and conclusion:
The introduction set out the overall structure of the essay.
Provide a conclusion
that clearly summarises your findings without adding any new information. You have included a introduction that signposts the overall structure of the essay You have provided a conclusion that succinctly, accurately & comprehensively summarises your findings without adding any new information.
(8.5 – 10 marks) You have included a introduction sets out the overall structure of the essay.
You have provided a conclusion that
clearly & accurately summarises your findings without adding any new information. (7.5 – 8.4 marks) You have included a introduction that sets out the overall structure of the essay
You have provided a conclusion that clearly summarises your findings without adding any new information. (6.5 – 7.4 marks) You have included introduction that broadly outlines t overall structure o essay.
You have provided conclusion that pa summarises your findings without a any new informati (5 – 6.4 marks)
Provides an explanation of the value assumptions evident in this case study. You have examined
items of value
assumptions
succinctly, clearly and with detail in relation to the clinical case study.
(29.5 – 35 marks) You have explored items of value assumptions in relation to the clinical case study.
(24.5 – 29.4 marks) You have described items of value assumptions in relation to the clinicalcase study. (19.5 – 24.4 marks) You have outlined of value assumptio relation to the clin case study. (15 – 19.4 marks)
Provides an
explanation of how the
principles of transpersonal caring can be applied to improve the interactions in the case study. You have offered an explination that succinctly, accurately, and clearly defines and describes how the principles of transpersonal caring can be applied to You have offered an explination that accurately and clearly defines and describes how the principles of transpersonal caring can be applied to improve the You have offered an explination that clearly defines and describes how the principles of transpersonal caring can be applied to improve You have offered a explination that d and describes how principles of transpersonal cari be applied to impr the interactions in scenario.
improve the
interactions in the case study.
(29.5 – 35 marks) interactions in the case study.
(24.5 – 29.4 marks) the interactions in the scenario. (19.5 – 24.4 marks) (15 – 19.4 marks)
Communicates
Professionally
(Academic writing and presentation). Language features and
structures are used to convey meaning
effectively, clearly, unambiguously, concisely, and in a formal academic style, with few spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors. Presentation guidelines have been followed.
(4.5 -5 marks) Language features and structures are used to convey meaning clearly, and in a formal academic style, with occasional minor spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors. Presentation guidelines have been followed.
(3.5 – 4.4 marks) The meaning is apparent to the reader, although text contains minor errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, and/or structure, and lacks
clarity occasionally. Presentation guidelines have been followed. (2.5 – 3.4 marks) The meaning is ap to the reader, alth text contains erro spelling, grammar choice, and/or stru and lacks clarity occasionally. Presentation guid have been followe (1.5 – 2.4 marks)
Uses evidence to support and build knowledge in practice
(Academic referencing). The assessment is supported by & related to a wide variety of peer reviewed references which include journal articles, professional manuals and documents, textbooks, and module readings.
Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, and is error free for the APA
7th ed. style conventions.
(8.5 – 10 marks) The assessment is supported by &
related to a variety of peer reviewed references which include journal
articles, professional manuals and documents, textbooks, and module readings.
Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity,
and conforms to APA
7th ed. style conventions, with one or two errors.
(7.5 – 8.4 marks) The assessment is supported by more
than 5 – 6 peer reviewed references from module readings, textbooks, and professional manuals and documents.
Referencing is comprehensive and mostly accurate according to APA 7th ed. style conventions.
Up to 3 minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices have no impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity. (6.5 – 7.4 marks) The assessment is supported by at le 4 peer reviewed references from m readings, textbook professional manu and documents.
Referencing is comprehensive an mostly accurate according to APA 7 style conventions few minor errors.
Up to 8 minor erro omissions in style formatting choice have no impact on transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity (5 – 6.4 marks)
Academic
Integrity
Assessment will be submitted to
Turnitin by the
Subject
Coordinator Students can submit their own assessments Turnitin report indicates a clear attempt has been made to adhere to academic integrit and referencing conventions and avoid plagiarism. It is evident that the student has taken steps to show respect for and acknowledge others work appropriately, as per th CSU Academic Integrity Policy. SY
Looking for answers ?
