Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

Veritas Academics | Premier Editing and Original Academic Writing Support

Plagiarism-Free Papers, Dissertation Editing & Expert Assignment Assistance

MANU7007 Validation Science Project 2025 : Validation of a 5,000L Bioreactor for Cell Culturing

Table of Contents

1.0 Design features:

Task 1: Place concise and precise detail into Table 1:

Table 1: Equipment Information
System:
Purpose:
Supplier:
Application:
Key Features Description
(what it is?):

Task 2: Construct a table of parameters for operation of the system

Table 2 : Operational Conditions
Parameter Conditions Rationale

Task 3: Based on design features and conditions, construct a drawing (Figure 1)

2.0 Results.

Task 4: Identify THREE IQ tests (Table 3) under the headings: IQ Test No, Qualification Test Name, Verification/Checking Purpose (what are you checking?). Include comprehensive detail for the Rationale i.e. the why, how and impact if failure occurred.

Table 3 :
Test No Qualification
Test Name
Verification/Checking
Purpose-what are you checking?
Rationale Ref
IQ-1
IQ-2
IQ-3

Task 5: Identify THREE OQ tests (Table 4) under the headings: OQ Test No, Qualification Test Name, Verification/Checking Purpose (what are you checking?). Include comprehensive detail for the Rationale i.e. the why, how and impact if failure occurred.

Table 4:
PQ Test No Qualification Test
Name
Verification/Checking
Purpose
Ref
OQ-1
OQ-2
OQ-3

Task 6: Identify THREE considerations for completing PV (Table 5)-what do you need to verify for in PV

Table 5:
Test No Qualification
Test Name
Verification/Checking
Purpose-what are you checking?
Rationale Ref
PQ-1
PQ-2
PQ-3

Task 7: Identify THREE CQA, THREE CQI and THREE CPP of the process and include rationale to below in Table format (Tables 6-7).

Table 6:
No CQA CQI Why Critical? What does it
effect?
Ref
1
2
3
Table 7:
No CPP Why Critical? What does it effect? Ref
1
2
3
  • HINT: Check out ISPE for Pharmaceutical Engineering Guides for New and renovated Facilities Volume 5 Commissioning and Qualification.
  • Reference your information presented.
  • Be concise and precise-fit concise and precise information into the tables provided. Sentences are only required not long paragraphs.

References

  • The department recommends the use of the Harvard Referencing System. Information on this is given in CANVAS.

Appendix I-CHAT GPT Statement

Appendix II-1 page summary of how the project was completed and Reflection

Appendix III -Brain storming tool

Appendix IV-Meeting Minutes

  • Include minutes of meetings (see minutes template). Summarise how the project was conducted and managed. What tools were used (social media, email etc)
  • Include-date, time, venue, action items, actions completed (from previous meeting), issues.
  • Include meeting with lecturer as a meeting minute
Are You Searching Answer of this Question? Request Ireland Writers to Write a plagiarism Free Copy for You.
Get A Free Quote

Submission

DUE WK8 Monday 3rd Nov 13.00
Submit ONE hard copy (print out)-details to be confirmed.
Submit ONE project report online through CANVAS.
Your project will be processed through SIMULARITY on CANVAS for a similarity score.
Marks detected for similarity scores above 20%.
Marks deducted for late submission
Marks deducted or 0% marks will be given to team members not contributing

Important to note in project writing:

  • Figure captions underneath
  • Table captions above
  • Include page numbers and No capitals mid sentence

http://www.turnitin.com/

Appendix I: CHAT GPT Statement

Copy and paste for each team member

Student Name Was CHAT GPT used Name of Tool Research words/statements used Extent of Tool applied What sections applied

Appendix II: 1 Page summary of how project was conducted, what tools used and a reflection

Meet as a Team- face to face/online etc
What media platforms used-ZOOM, TEAMS, Whatsapp etc
How were documents shared-Googleapps etc?

Reflection

If you had to redo the project again what would you do differently?

Page 5 of 9

Appendix III: Brainstorming tool:

Topic is:
What is the main subject:
Relevant Definitions to research
Purpose in Biopharma-where used:
Validation aspects: – How does it interact in the process?
– Direct/indirect system?
– How does the system Impact on product’s quality?
– If something goes wrong what/how would this impact?
Design features: What will the system do?

How does it work?

What considerations will need to be decided on?

Appendix IV:

Meeting Minutes

Date
Time
Place
Meeting called by: Type of meeting:
Facilitator: Note taker:
Attendees:

Minutes

Agenda item: Discussion:
Action items Person responsible Deadline
Discussion topic Action items Status
1. 1.
Get Solution of this Assessment. Hire Experts to solve this assignment for you Before Deadline.
Get A Free Quote

Project Titles

Project  Project Title
A Validation of Cell Culturing: Qualification of a

Bioreactor (5,000L)

 

B Validation of Mixing Tank for Media prior to use in USP: Qualification of a Vessel Tank

(5,000L)

 

 

Marking Scheme                                                                                                                                           

Deliverables:

  1. DESIGN (15 marks) Design Tables 1 (5 marks)
    Design Conditions (5 marks)
    Drawing (5 marks)
  2. RESULTS: Body of work (66 marks)
    OQ Table (18 marks)
    PQ Table (18 marks)
    PV (9 marks) iv. CQA defined-table (9 marks)
    CQI (3 marks)
    CPP Table (9 marks)
  1. Project Report and Project Management (19 marks)
    Structure, Presentation, Table of Contents (4 marks)
    Appendix I- Brainstorming (5 marks)
    Referencing Format (2 marks) iv. References: Source of material (3 marks)
    Project Management -minutes of meetings (5 marks)
  Design Features and Drawings (15 marks) Body of Work –Results (66 marks) Presentation, Structure, Table of Contents and List of definitions (4 marks) Brain Storming-

Appendix I (5marks)

Application of

Harvard Referencing

System (2 marks)

Ref Sources (3 marks) Project Mgt

& team effort

(5 marks)

EXCELL  

High level of detail and covers all main points in details.

Publication LEVEL Implementation level in manufacturing (70%)

 

High standard of results delivery

Accurate results Detailed rationale and understanding delivered. References used

Publication LEVEL (70%)

Contains all main sections.

Exceptionally written/grammar

Excellent standard of presentation and struture

Excellent presentation of information

using diagrams/tables

Flow is good and easy to read. Publication LEVEL (70%)

Excellent detail and understands the use of the unit operation

(70%)

Used correctly.

Referencing format correct in text used.

Publication Level

 

Excellent source and broad range of references from difference sources

(80%)

 

Excellent sources, variety of references used (70%)

 

Publication LEVEL

Professional level
VG Contains majority of main points.

Missing details for operation.(60%)

Main aspects of results included in report. More effort in rationale development required.

One or two minor gaps, lacking detail/information in a few places. References used (60%)

Contains all main sections. High standard of writing, and presentation.

Tables/diagrams included.

Captions for tables/diagrams could be better.

Few grammar or spelling errors. (60%)

Comprehensive-more detail required in places (60%) Harvard referencing system used correctly

Slight error in the referencing format correct in text used

(60%)

Very good level of research.

Recent publications Broad research from different sources from engineering and science

(60%)

Completed and

Clear.

Gmore work Missing major details for operation.

Requires re-work of information for implementation and operation. (40%)

 

Main aspects presented but gaps in information in the results.

Attempted rationale.

Lacking examples/details in a lot of places.

Information vague and not complete.

Further clarity required.

References used (40%)

Fair attempt of layout/ generally expressed.

Presentation effort made.

Many grammar and spelling mistakes.

No captions.

Missing sections (40%)

 

Average-gap presents and has a vague idea of its operation (40%) Some references used in introduction and discussion More effort. (50%). Good effort, could have researched more.

4-8 references.

Average effort
A lot

more

effort

Major gaps, for implementation and operation

Inadequate detail.

Complete rework (<40)

Gaps in the results.

Missing results in one section. Incorrect results in places but attempt given.

Rationale incorrect or poor detail

or vague (35%)

 

Wrong focus.

Significant aspects not mentioned.

No rationale given in a lot of places (<35%)

Presentation, structure, layout and grammar mistakes.

Very little effort.

No use of tables/diagrams. No cations (40%)

Major gaps/wrong perspective (<40%) Attempt at referencing system used but not the Harvard system. No references used/attempt made in text (40%).

 

 

Referencing system mixed up.

 

Attempt to lacking Attempt to Lacking
Stuck in Completing this Assignment and feeling stressed ? Take our Private Writing Services
Get A Free Quote

MANU7007 Validation Science Project 2025 : Validation of a 5,000L Bioreactor for Cell Culturing
Scroll to top