|
Grading Criteria
|
Needs Work
0-17
|
Emerging
18-20
|
Strong
21-23
|
Ideal
24-25
|
|
1.What are the basic
aims of education? (½ page)
|
Content is off-topic,
unclear, under-developed, lacks insight. Many instances of disorganization.
Does NOT meet minimum length requirements. Non-professional writing
style: many poorly constructed sentences. Errors in grammar, spelling,
and/or punctuation sprinkled throughout.
|
Much content is
off-topic, many lapses in clarity and/or development of content. Lacks
insight. Some instances of disorganization. Does NOT meet minimum
length requirements. Non-professional writing style: many poorly
constructed sentences. Several grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation
errors.
|
Most content is on-topic,
clearly explained, insightful, well developed. Adequately
organized. Meets minimum length requirements. Professional
writing style with most sentences well-constructed. A few grammatical,
spelling, and/or punctuation errors.
|
On-topic, clearly
explained, insightful, well developed. Well-organized. Meets
minimum length requirements. Professional writing style and
well-constructed sentences. Almost no grammatical, spelling, or
punctuation errors.
|
|
2. Should schools teach
what is moral and "good"? If not, why not? If so, how? (½
page)
|
Content is off-topic,
unclear, under-developed, lacks insight. Many instances of
disorganization. Does NOT meet minimum length requirements.
Non-professional writing style: many poorly constructed sentences.
Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation sprinkled throughout.
|
Much content is
off-topic, many lapses in clarity and/or development of content. Lacks
insight. Some instances of disorganization. Does NOT meet minimum
length requirements. Non-professional writing style: many poorly
constructed sentences. Several grammatical, spelling, and/or
punctuation errors.
|
Most content is
on-topic, clearly explained, insightful, well developed. Adequately
organized. Meets minimum length requirements. Professional
writing style with most sentences well-constructed. A few grammatical,
spelling, and/or punctuation errors.
|
On-topic, clearly
explained, insightful, well developed. Well-organized. Meets
minimum length requirements. Professional writing style and
well-constructed sentences. Almost no grammatical, spelling, or
punctuation errors.
|
|
3. What knowledge should
be included in the curriculum? (½ page)
|
Content is off-topic,
unclear, under-developed, lacks insight. Many instances of
disorganization. Does NOT meet minimum length requirements.
Non-professional writing style: many poorly constructed sentences.
Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation sprinkled throughout.
|
Much content is
off-topic, many lapses in clarity and/or development of content. Lacks
insight. Some instances of disorganization. Does NOT meet minimum
length requirements. Non-professional writing style: many poorly
constructed sentences. Several grammatical, spelling, and/or
punctuation errors.
|
Most content is
on-topic, clearly explained, insightful, and well developed. Adequately
organized. Meets minimum length requirements. Professional
writing style with most sentences well-constructed. A few grammatical,
spelling, and/or punctuation errors.
|
On-topic, clearly explained,
insightful, well developed. Well-organized. Meets minimum length
requirements. Professional writing style and well-constructed
sentences. Almost no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
|
|
4. What are the most
effective methods of instruction? (½ page)
|
Content is off-topic,
unclear, under-developed, lacks insight. Many instances of
disorganization. Does NOT meet minimum length requirements.
Non-professional writing style: many poorly constructed sentences.
Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation sprinkled throughout.
|
Much content is
off-topic, many lapses in clarity and/or development of content. Lacks
insight. Some instances of disorganization. Does NOT meet minimum
length requirements. Non-professional writing style: many poorly
constructed sentences. Several grammatical, spelling, and/or
punctuation errors.
|
Most content is
on-topic, clearly explained, insightful, well developed. Adequately
organized. Meets minimum length requirements. Professional
writing style with most sentences well-constructed. A few grammatical,
spelling, and/or punctuation errors.
|
On-topic, clearly
explained, insightful, well developed. Well-organized. Meets
minimum length requirements. Professional writing style and
well-constructed sentences. Almost no grammatical, spelling, or
punctuation errors.
|
|
5. What is the role of
the teacher? (½ page)
|
Content is off-topic,
unclear, under-developed, lacks insight. Many instances of
disorganization. Does NOT meet minimum length requirements. Non-professional
writing style: many poorly constructed sentences. Errors in grammar,
spelling, and/or punctuation sprinkled throughout.
|
Much content is
off-topic, many lapses in clarity and/or development of content. Lacks
insight. Some instances of disorganization. Does NOT meet minimum
length requirements. Non-professional writing style: many poorly
constructed sentences. Several grammatical, spelling, and/or
punctuation errors.
|
Most content is
on-topic, clearly explained, insightful, well developed. Adequately
organized. Meets minimum length requirements. Professional
writing style with most sentences well-constructed. A few grammatical,
spelling, and/or punctuation errors.
|
On-topic, clearly
explained, insightful, well developed. Well-organized. Meets
minimum length requirements. Professional writing style and
well-constructed sentences. Almost no grammatical, spelling, or
punctuation errors.
|
|
6. How have people,
experiences, and events influenced your personal educational philosophy? For
example, did you recognize the principles of a particular philosophy in the
methods and aims of a favorite teacher? (½ page)
|
Content is off-topic,
unclear, under-developed, lacks insight. Many instances of
disorganization. Does NOT meet minimum length requirements.
Non-professional writing style: many poorly constructed sentences.
Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation sprinkled throughout.
|
Much content is
off-topic, many lapses in clarity and/or development of content. Lacks
insight. Some instances of disorganization. Does NOT meet minimum
length requirements. Non-professional writing style: many poorly
constructed sentences. Several grammatical, spelling, and/or
punctuation errors.
|
Most content is
on-topic, clearly explained, insightful, well developed. Adequately
organized. Meets minimum length requirements. Professional
writing style with most sentences well-constructed. A few grammatical,
spelling, and/or punctuation errors.
|
On-topic, clearly
explained, insightful, well developed. Well-organized. Meets
minimum length requirements. Professional writing style and
well-constructed sentences. Almost no grammatical, spelling, or
punctuation errors.
|
