EssayLink.net| Strategic Management for Airlines and Airports Task 1 & 2 Assessment Brief 2025-26

EssayLink.net| Strategic Management for Airlines and Airports Task 1 & 2 Assessment Brief 2025-26

 

Module Title:

Strategic Management for Airlines and Airports

Assessment Title:

Task 1 – Strategic Management Report: Individual Report

Examine an existing organisation’s strategy.

Individual/Group:

Individual

Weighting:

2000 word Report 40%

Submission Date:

Report – Tuesday 25th November 2025 at 3pm

Task 1: Strategic Management report (40%)

In order to complete the individual report students will need to select an appropriate organisation (Airline or Airport or other aviation related organisation) and research and undertake a critical analysis of the study organisation’s strategy. The report will be expected to cover the following:

GET THIS PAPER HANDLE BY EXPERTS AT https://essaylink.net/order

  • Describe and critically analyse the company’s strategic development, its targeted market, its global competitive position.
  • Critically review the company's mission statement, stakeholders, organisational culture, governance structure and corporate social responsibility (CSR) stance. 
  • Use tables or diagrams to summarise the organisation's PESTEL, 5-Forces analysis, VRIO or Value Chain and its’ resources/competences. 
  • Use a SWOT analysis to review and evaluate the current situation of the organisation
  • Comparison study with its close competitors, related to its strengths and weaknesses and to the opportunities & threats identified.

The strategic report should be presented as a business style report following an appropriate format within the word guide of 2000 words. 

GET THIS PAPER HANDLE BY EXPERTS AT https://essaylink.net/order

Note tables that are numeric, charts and appendices are excluded from the word limit. Students are expected to demonstrate extensive up-to-date research from high quality academic and professional sources to support the analysis at every stage.
Word guide 2000 (+/- 10%)

This task addresses all LO’s for the module:

  • Apply strategic business management principles to critically evaluate airline and airport management practice
  • Critically evaluate the dynamic and ever-changing macro and micro business environments, assessing business opportunities and threats, and make justified strategic decisions for airline and airport businesses.

Are You Looking Solution of This Assignment

GET THIS PAPER HANDLE BY EXPERTS AT https://essaylink.net/order

Module Title:

Strategic Management for Airlines and Airports

Assessment Title:

Task 2 – Strategic Management Report: Individual Report

Propose a revised strategy for the same selected organisation from Task 001

Individual/Group:

Individual

Weighting:

4000 word Report 60%

Submission Date:

Report – Tuesday 6th  January 2026  at 3pm

Task 2: Strategic Management report (40%)

In order to complete this individual report, students will need to continue with their selected organisation (Airline or Airport or other aviation related organisation) and provide a revised and fully justified strategy based on the critical analysis of the study organisation’s strategy from Task 1 and develop this appropriately for your perception of a future reality. The report will be expected to cover the following:

  • Describe and critically analyse the company’s strategic development, its targeted market, its global competitive position.
  • Critically review the company's mission statement, stakeholders, organisational culture, governance structure and corporate social responsibility (CSR) stance. 
  • Use tables or diagrams to summarise the organisation's PESTEL, 5-Forces analysis, VRIO or Value Chain and its’ resources/competences. 
  • Use a SWOT analysis to review and evaluate the current situation of the organisation
  • Comparison study with its close competitors, related to its strengths and weaknesses and to the opportunities & threats identified.

The strategic report should be presented as a business style report following an appropriate format within the word guide of 4000 words. 

Note tables that are numeric, charts and appendices are excluded from the word limit. Students are expected to demonstrate extensive up-to-date research from high quality academic and professional sources to support the analysis at every stage.
Word guide 4000 (+/- 10%)

This task addresses all LO’s for the module:

  • Apply strategic business management principles to critically evaluate airline and airport management practice
  • Critically evaluate the dynamic and ever-changing macro and micro business environments, assessing business opportunities and threats, and make justified strategic decisions for airline and airport businesses.

Submission of this Coursework

You must submit your work via BOTH the Assignment Submission Point and Turnitin on the Blackboard site. 

In the Assessment folder, you will find 

  • Online submission: The submission point will be available for you to upload your work. 
  • Turnitin submission: You can upload your work as many times as necessary to Turnitin to check your referencing before you upload the final version by the submission deadline. 

Assessment Feedback

Before the Assignment Submission

The module has several designated assessment support sessions (please check the Schedule of Study). There will be a briefing on your assessment at the beginning of the module, and this will be revisited throughout the module. There are formative opportunities to gain feedback on your airline proposal before submission of your report.  

After the Assignment Submission 

You can expect feedback to be provided to you within three weeks of the submission date, in keeping with university guidelines. Feedback is provided electronically via the Blackboard site on an assessment grid in which you can see your performance against each of the criteria. The feedback will also include a narrative of comments which should help you understand how and why the mark was derived.

5. Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity – AI&AI

It is important that if you use AI tools to generate an assignment that you do not submit it as if it were your own work. You must check the AI Transparency Scale (AITS) to determine what level of AI use is allowed. 

Our regulations state: 

Contract cheating/concerns over authorship: This form of misconduct involves another person (or artificial intelligence) creating the assignment which you then submit as your own. Examples of this sort of misconduct include: buying an assignment from an ‘essay mill’/professional writer; submitting an assignment which you have downloaded from a file-sharing site; acquiring an essay from another student or family member and submitting it as your own; attempting to pass off work created by artificial intelligence as your own. These activities show a clear intention to deceive the marker and are treated as misconduct. 

AI Transparency Scale (AITS)

For this assessment, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools is permitted up to AITS 2 of the Artificial Intelligence Transparency Scale (AITS). As part of your assessment submission, you are required to include a brief AI Transparency Statement that clearly communicates how you have used Artificial Intelligence (AI) in completing this work. Use the Artificial Intelligence Transparency Scale (AITS) to select the descriptor that best describes your use of AI, from AITS 1 – No AI to AITS 2 – AI for Shaping.

Your statement should:

  • Indicate the AITS descriptor you are using.
  • Briefly describe how AI was used (if applicable).
  • Reflect on your own contribution and how you engaged critically with AI tools.

Please include this statement at the beginning of the report – between your cover page and table of content in your assessment. Failure to comply with this requirement may be considered a breach of academic integrity under our Academic Conduct Policy.

SHU AI Transparency Scale (AITS)

SHU AI Transparency Scale (AITS)

AITS

Descriptor

Transparency Statement

AI Contributions

Human Contribution

1

No AI

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has not been used for any part of the activity.

AI is not used for any part of the activity.

All aspects of the activity are human generated, created, edited, and developed.

2

AI for Shaping

AI has been used to shape the initial and/or final parts of the activity.

AI is used for shaping parts of the activity. This includes initial outlining, concept development, prompting thinking, and/or improving structure/quality of the final output.

Most of the activity is human developed/generated. AI ideas and suggestions are refined and reviewed. AI outputs are used for discrete and specific goals/outcomes.

3

AI for Developing

AI has been directed for enhanced development of concepts and outputs.

AI is used to undertake detailed development of many or most aspects of an activity and outputs of that activity.

The human takes a significant role in the enhancement, refinement, and critical review of AI generated elements, combining or curating for any outputs.

4

AI for Enhancing

AI has been implemented for all elements of the task.

AI is used extensively throughout the task to achieve goals and outcomes.

The human directs the use of AI for effective outcomes within an activity. Critical thinking is evidenced for any outputs.

5

AI for Innovating

AI has been used for all elements of a task or piece of work, and it has been used in new, creative, and innovative ways through advanced techniques.

AI is implemented in an advanced and innovative way throughout all aspects of the activity.

AI is used creatively and critically by the human. The human uses AI as a co-creator with a critical thinking approach to generating novel AI activities and outputs.

Assessment Criteria 

Level 6 – UG Marking Grid

Criteria

1-19% Fail

(Highly insufficient)

20-39% Fail

(Insufficient)

40-49% Third

(Sufficient)

50-59% Lower Second

(Good)

60-69% Upper Second

(Very Good)

70-84% First

(Excellent)

85-100% First

(Exceptional)

Knowledge & Understanding

 

 

Highly insufficient knowledge or understanding of the subject

Insufficient knowledge and understanding of the subject

 

 

Sufficient knowledge and understanding to deal with terminology, basic facts and concepts

Good knowledge and understanding of the subject

 

 

Very good knowledge and understanding of the subject

 

 

Excellent knowledge and understanding of the subject

The student is typically able to go beyond what has been taught 

Exceptional breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding of the subject

Analysis & evaluation

 

Taught concepts and facts are reproduced in a disjointed or irrelevant/incorrect manner 

Fails to address the outcomes addressed by the brief

Overly descriptive with minimal analysis of key topics and themes

Fails to address some aspects of the brief

Arguments may be weak or poorly constructed

Sufficient but more generally descriptive  

Fails to make meaningful synthesis

Arguments may be weak or poorly constructed

Good analysis and evaluation, although balanced towards the descriptive rather than critical or analytical 

Very good analysis and evaluation

 

Student is typically able to relate facts/concepts together with some ability to apply to known/taught contexts