A. Examine how the healthcare systems of England, Japan, Germany, and Switzerland compare to those of the United States by performing the following:
1. Pick one of England, Japan, Germany, or Switzerland as the nation whose healthcare system you will contrast with the U.S. healthcare system.
2. Evaluate how accessible the two healthcare systems are to children, jobless individuals, and retirees.
Discuss how the two healthcare systems address prescription drug coverage.
b. Discover in which of the two healthcare systems a referral to visit a specialist is necessary.
c. Talk about the two healthcare systems’ prior condition coverage.
3. Explain two financial consequences for patients with reference to the healthcare delivery variations between the two nations (i.e.; how are the patients financially impacted).
Overview
“Medicare for all,” often known as “single-payer,” is quickly becoming a rallying cry for Democrats.
This is sometimes followed by requests to equal “the rest of the world’s” health-care coverage. However, this misses one important fact: the “rest of the globe” is not all the same.
The similarity is universal coverage, but affluent nations have approached it differently, with some depending largely on the government (as with single-payer), some relying more on private insurers, and others somewhere in between.
Experts disagree on which is best; a lot depends on one’s point of view. However, we decided it would be great to hold a mini tournament.
We chose eight nations with diverse health-care systems and created a bracket by assigning seeds at random.