HRM357 Workforce Planning Tutor-Marked Assignment (TMA01) July 2025 Presentation

TUTOR-MARKED ASSIGNMENT (TMA01)

This assignment is worth 45% of the final score for HRM357 Workforce Planning.

The cut-off date for this assignment is 20 October 2025 (Monday), 2355hrs.

This is an individual assignment. You are required to upload a single report to CANVAS and please be advised to note down the Submission ID as acknowledgement of submission. Submission ID is the ONLY proof of submission, especially in the event of technical failure.

Submission via Canvas mobile app is not supported.

Multiple submissions are allowed before the cut-off date. All assignments are to be submitted via T/TG group in CANVAS. Please ensure that you have submitted the assignment to the correct folder. Re-submission is NOT allowed after the cut-off date (including the grace period). Only the latest submission copy will be considered for grading. Any appeals for resubmission after the cut-off date will not be entertained.

The university’s prevailing mark deduction scheme will apply to all late submissions.

Please include a cover page with the following details:

  • Title of this course, your name and PI number
  • Tutorial group
  • Submission Date
  • Academic Integrity Declaration Statement (refer to “Declaration of Academic Integrity.docx”)

The Academic Integrity Declaration Statement must be completed and appended to the cover page of your assignment submitted for assessment. If you have declared the usage of generative AI in the academic integrity declaration statement in the cover page of your assignment, you will need to complete the Attribution Table as shown in Table A in “Declaration of Academic Integrity.docx” (available for download on Canvas> L/LG > Modules). Marks deduction may apply if resubmissions of a completed declaration form and table are required.

In accordance with the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA), please DO NOT include other personal particulars.

To facilitate your submission into Canvas, name your document file strictly to this format – CourseCode_AssignmentCode_UserID_FullName.

For example, ABC123_TMA01_Sally001_TanMeiMeiSally (omit D/O, S/O).

Write My Assignment
Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments

Native Singapore Writers Team

  • 100% Plagiarism-Free Essay
  • Highest Satisfaction Rate
  • Free Revision
  • On-Time Delivery

Academic Integrity

All written work is required to be referenced. That is, formally acknowledging the source of ideas, quotes, or facts gained from other authors and which are used directly or indirectly in the text of your papers. The American Psychological Association (APA) referencing style must be used for all in-text citations, references, figures, and tables. For more information, you may refer to https://libguides.suss.edu.sg/apa.

Honesty and integrity are the foundations of all forms of academic work, including at SUSS. Direct lifting of texts without acknowledgment is plagiarism, and disciplinary action will be taken. Students are advised to synthesise and rephrase ideas in your own words. If you use generative AI in your assignment, be sure to provide in-text citations and attribute using Table A. For formats of proper citation and attribution of generative AI generative response, please refer to https://rise.articulate.com/share/GlQuywqm9MmZkxbaGig0HjjFA73k7aBr#/ .

Please be aware that all submissions will be automatically screened by the Turnitin, which contains plagiarism detection through a similarity index. Similarity index is NOT, by itself, an indicator of whether you have (self) plagiarised or not. A responsible way of drawing on external sources is citation and attribution. Review https://www.suss.edu.sg/aboutsuss/centres/teaching-and-learning-centre/learning-support for guidelines and tips to avoid plagiarism and guidance on the use of generative AI (See Section 5.1 Part K).

You are reminded that the penalties for academic dishonesty are severe and may include expulsion from the programme or referral to SUSS’ Student Disciplinary Group. Details on the academic dishonesty can be found in your student handbook. Please refer to Section 5.2 Academic Matters of the University Student Handbook on academic integrity and plagiarism.

Formatting Instructions

The assignment is to be submitted in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) with the following format:

  • Font type: Times New Roman
  • Font size: 12 point
  • Line spacing: 1.5 lines
  • Margin: 1” all round
  • Paragraph Alignment: Justified

The written assignment should not exceed 2500 words. Please include figures and tables only when necessary and when they provide supplementary information to your assignment.  Figures and Tables are included in the word count.

Assignment 

Read the Straits Times news article by Tay Hong Yi published on 19 March 2025.

An upcoming revamp of the work permit framework is set to reduce the costs and time needed to train new migrant workers. This will help firms carve out higher-value jobs for locals while meeting the demand for rank-and-file workers, industry players told The Straits Times.

Companies in services and manufacturing also welcomed an expansion to a list of occupations for which they can hire work permit holders from more locations, with more job roles and more locations added to the list. The surprise addition of Bhutan as one of the new places where employees can be recruited will let firms access a whole new profile of workers, observers said.

Minister for Manpower Tan See Leng had announced on March 6 that from July 1, there will be no hard cap on the maximum duration that work permit holders can work here – a move that industry players said is one of the furthest-reaching labour policy changes in recent years.

Currently, these workers can work in Singapore for only between 14 and 26 years, depending on their skill level and country of origin.

With the change, work permit holders – aside from migrant domestic workers, who fall under a slightly different regime – will be able to work till the prevailing retirement age, which is now 63.

One worker who will benefit from the lifted cap is Mr Sethu Rajinikanth, a facility executive at Singapore shipbuilder Strategic Marine.

If this cap were not lifted, Mr Rajinikanth, who has worked for the company since he came to Singapore 17 years ago, would be able to work here for only another nine years due to the 26year limit on his work permit.

Under the new rules, Mr Rajinikanth, who is 48, will be allowed to continue working here for about five years longer.

He said he feels greater job security with the pressure of the employment limit lifted, as he can continue building his career in Singapore and save up more for his future.

“Otherwise, I might have to go home or find work in another country,” he said, adding that he enjoys the variety of tasks he gets to do, which includes overseeing repairs and coordinating the work of contractors.

Mr Rajinikanth, who is an Indian national, also said he looks forward to mentoring younger workers at his workplace.

Mr Ivan Koh, Strategic Marine’s chief corporate finance officer, said these changes will help the firm maintain a higher level of experienced staff, making the company’s operations more stable and efficient.

That said, Mr Koh noted some potential challenges, such as managing higher healthcare costs and adapting work processes to these workers’ physical capabilities.

“Nonetheless, the benefits of preserving institutional knowledge and enhancing workforce continuity far outweigh these challenges,” he said.

By reducing the required frequency of recruiting and training new hires, the move will also let the firm better plan its workforce development and pipeline of skilled workers for the long term, he said.

Out of 238 work permit holders currently employed by Strategic Marine, 12 of them are aged 50 and above.

Many have a maximum tenure of 26 years, in view of their higher skill levels, with five workers having worked for Strategic Marine for more than 14 years already, Mr Koh said.

Meanwhile, the removal of employment duration limits for work permit holders will especially help employers in the process industry retain welders, equipment fitters and field supervisors.

The process industry includes manufacturers of petroleum, petrochemicals, speciality chemicals and pharmaceutical products, as well as firms that build and maintain the plants of these manufacturers.

“These jobs require deep technical expertise and years of hands-on experience yet remain hard to fill with local workers due to their specialised nature,” said Mr Wayne Yap, executive director of the Association of Process Industry.

Despite the latest rule change, Mr Yap said manpower constraints remain a challenge. Foreign worker quota and levy requirements for the sector were recently tightened in 2024. “This (new) policy provides much-needed flexibility, but companies must continue adapting to ensure sustainable workforce planning.”

The moves help address persistent manpower shortages that manufacturing firms face, while enabling continued investments in automation, advanced manufacturing technologies and innovation, said Mr Lennon Tan, president of the Singapore Manufacturing Federation (SMF).

Beyond the changes to maximum tenure and maximum age, the sector will also get to tap the Non-Traditional Sources Occupation List to a greater degree.

The list was introduced in September 2023 to let services and manufacturing employers hire manual labour on work permits from a wider range of locations, rather than employing them under an S Pass, to ensure a higher skills bar for the S Pass as originally intended.

However, employers must pay those hired on the list at least $2,000, and these workers must account for 8 per cent or less of the employer’s total headcount, excluding Employment Pass holders.

A range of manufacturing operator roles will be among those added to the list come Sept 1, though exactly which roles these are, remains to be seen.

Mr Tan said: “We also appreciate the government’s balanced approach in complementing foreign manpower policies with ongoing efforts to develop local talent through initiatives like SkillsFuture.

“This ensures that Singaporeans continue to take on higher-value roles while foreign workers help sustain essential operations.”

He also said the inclusion of manufacturing operator roles on the list fulfils a “longstanding request from the industry”.

“Manufacturing segments such as precision engineering, electronics, aerospace and medical technology stand to benefit the most,” Mr Tan added, saying that these segments have faced manpower challenges that affect productivity and competitiveness.

Buy Custom Answer of This Assessment & Raise Your Grades
Get A Free Quote

Source:

Tay, H. Y. (2025, March 19). Work permit changes to ease Labour Crunch, spur better jobs for locals: Industry players. The Straits Times.

https://www.straitstimes.com/business/work-permit-changes-ease-labour-crunch-spurbetter-jobs-for-locals-industry-players

I. Task

The objective of this assignment is to explore how government policies on foreign workers impact businesses operating in Singapore. More specifically, the assignment needs to appraise, using available published information, how workforce planning is affected as businesses grapple with the supply of certain groups of workers to address possible shortages of labour. As mentioned in the news article, there are persistent manpower shortages in some industries. Some jobs in these industries require deep technical skills which take time to build, and the retention of trained manpower remain challenges for companies in industries mentioned in the news article. This assignment requires recent and current secondary research on the challenges in building a sustainable labour supply and the appropriate government initiatives and policies in balancing the manpower needs of organisations and at the same time create better jobs for Singaporeans.

For this assignment, you are required to:

Research and select a company, with operations in Singapore, in any ONE (1) of the FEC (Future Economy Council) Cluster and FEC ITMs (Industry Transformation Maps). The company selected must be related to the news article above.

  • Describe the profile of the selected company.
  • Nature of business
  • Geographical presence
  • Overall business strategy
  • Major competitors
  • Annual revenue/turnover and employee headcount
  • Product life cycle/Industry life cycle
  • The FEC cluster and the FEC ITM the company operates in

(10 marks)

  • For the industry the selected company operates in, identify, and describe TWO (2) external factors to explain what is described in the news article. Discuss how each of these TWO (2) external factors will affect workforce planning within the industry. Secondary research is expected to support this discussion.

(25 marks)

  • Based on secondary research, select and describe appropriate government initiatives introduced to improve labour supply for the industry the company operates in. Evaluate how the selected government initiatives and regulations impact the selected company’s workforce planning. It is necessary to identify specific jobs in the selected organisation impacted by the appropriate government initiatives. Additional secondary research is required to complement the information in the news article.

(30 marks)

  • Formulate a workforce planning framework that the company is adopting with considerations from your discussions in (1), (2) & (3). Support your framework with research evidence and details of each planning process, examples of the specific forecasting tools used, workforce planning gaps and possible action plans using information from Q3. Omit the part of the workforce planning process that covers monitoring and evaluation.

(25 marks)

II.   Assessment Rubrics

The rubrics appended in Annex A will be used to score the assignment. As evident from the rubrics, a good paper must demonstrate quality in terms of content and written communication.

(10 marks)

Buy Custom Answer of This Assessment & Raise Your Grades
Get A Free Quote

Annex A  TMA Assessment Rubrics

 

Question Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Needs Improvement Inadequate
 (1)        
Describe company profile.

 

 

Description of the company covers all the required components and explanation on the ITM cluster the company is part of are clear and concise. Description of the company covers most of the required components and identification and description of the ITM cluster the company is part of are clear and adequate.

 

Description of company covers some of the required components and identification of the ITM cluster the company is part of are brief.

 

 

Description of company profile covers few of the required components and there is no clear identification of the ITM cluster the company is part of.

 

 

 (2)        
Discuss TWO (2) external factors Two factors clearly identified and discussed with comprehensive supporting secondary research. Clear discussion on the influences on the industry’s workforce planning Description of the two factors identified and discussed with adequate supporting secondary research.

Adequate discussion on the influences on the industry’s workforce planning

One factor identified and discussed with brief supporting secondary research.

Brief discussion on the influences on the industry’s workforce planning

Factors identified are not mentioned in the news article.

Factors identified without supporting secondary research in discussion. No discussion on the influences on the industry’s workforce planning

(3)        
Criteria for Each

Factor

Exceeds Expectations Meets Most Expectations Meets Some Expectations Needs Improvement
Describe the specific Government initiatives.

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive research on

appropriate government initiative/s to help organisations workforce planning is clearly evident.  

Adequate research on appropriate government initiative/s to help organisations improve workforce planning.   Brief research on appropriate government initiative/s to help organisations improve workforce planning. Research on appropriate government initiative/s to help organisations improve workforce planning is not clearly evident.
Evaluate the impact of initiative on each external factor.

 

 

Comprehensive discussion of how the government initiatives impact the company’s workforce planning, with clear applications to specific jobs within the organisation.

 

Mostly thorough discussion of how the government initiatives impact the company’s workforce planning, with good applications for specific jobs within the organisation.

 

Broad and general discussion on how the government initiatives impact the company’s workforce planning, with a few applications to specific jobs within the organisation. No or vague discussion on how the government initiatives impact the company’s workforce planning, with no applications to specific jobs within the organisation.
(4)        
Criteria for Each

Factor

Exceeds Expectations Meets Most Expectations Meets Some Expectations Needs Improvement
Formulate framework

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Clear identification and in- depth description of the workforce planning framework with clear and concise application of the framework to the selected company based on relevant evidence from research. Adequate identification and sufficient description of the workforce planning framework with appropriate application of the framework to the selected company based on relevant evidence from research. Brief identification and some description of the workforce planning framework with some appropriate application of the framework to the selected company based on relevant evidence from research. Vague or no identification and description of the workforce planning framework with few or no

application of the framework.

Written Quality

Criteria Exceeds Expectations Meets Most Expectations Meets Some Expectations Needs Improvement
Language

Easy to understand. Sentence construction

Correct spelling

 

 

 

 

 

 

Language is clear and consistent with good use of vocabulary; Pleasure to read.

Sentences are wellconstructed to support arguments.

No or minor spelling errors.

 

Language is clear and consistent; Easy to understand.

Clear and concise sentences.

Some spelling errors.

 

Language is somewhat unclear and inconsistent; Difficult to understand. Complex sentences that are

difficult to read

Many spelling errors.

 

Language is often unclear and inconsistent; cannot understand. Rambling and poorly constructed sentences. Excessive spelling errors.
Citations and References

 

 

 

 

Most citations and references were from credible and original sources and were applied according to the APA format. Many citations and references were from credible and original sources and were applied according to the APA format. Some citations and references were from credible and original sources and were applied according to the APA format.

 

No or few citations and references were from credible and original sources and were applied according to the APA format.

—- END OF ASSIGNMENT —-

Stuck with a lot of homework assignments and feeling stressed ?
Take professional academic assistance & Get 100% Plagiarism free papers
Get A Free Quote

The post HRM357 Workforce Planning Tutor-Marked Assignment (TMA01) July 2025 Presentation appeared first on Singapore Assignment Help.