SUPPLEMENTARY ASSIGNMENT QUESTION.
This assessment task provides the opportunity to demonstrate students’ understanding of the different research philosophies and methodologies covered throughout the unit. Students will critically review and analyse below-given research articles with an in-depth discussion, justification and analysis of methodology and methods. Students are required to provide a summary of the review at the end to demonstrate a well-developed understanding of the validity and reliability/trustworthiness of the research study.
For this assessment:
Identify a research study given below.
Analyse and critically Review using the appropriate Critical Appraisals Skills Programme (CASP) tool.
Argue and justify whether the methodology and methods are appropriate to address the research problem.
Students are required to articulate, discuss, and justify the strengths and weaknesses using relevant supporting evidence.
Assessment criteria:
•Your assignment must have an introduction, a body (which is the content of your analysis) and a conclusion.
•Use at least 10 additional peer-reviewed journal articles using APA 7th
FORMAT/guidelines to support your analysis. Information cited from an unreliable website, pamphlets or magazines is not acceptable for this paper.
ARTICLE :-
Olason, M. Andrason, R. H., Jonsdottir, I. H., Kristbergsdottir, H. (2018) Cognitive Behavioral
Therapy for Depression and Anxiety in an Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Program for Chronic Pain: a Randomized Control Trial with a 3-year Follow-up (Links to an external site.), Int J Behav. Med 25:55-66.
Assessment Tool
CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist https://casp-uk.net/wpcontent/uploads/2020/10/CASP_RCT_Checklist_PDF_Fillable_Form.pdf. .
