Complete Parts 1 and 2 below.
In Part 1, you will find and evaluate two sources from at least two different databases in the University Library. EBSCOhost and ProQuest are the most popular databases in the University Library.
In Part 2, you will write a brief 150- to 200-word response describing your experience using the library databases. This is a required part of the assignment.
Part 1: Source Evaluation
Select one of the following topics for this assignment:
· Obesity
· Affordable Care Act
· Healthcare Disparities
· Cyberbullying
· Online Predators
· Information Security
· Social Media
· Renewable Energy
· Financial Literacy
· Technology in Education
· Healthy Life Habits
· Career Exploration
· Mindfulness in Business or Education
· Immigration
· Homeland Security
· Global Women’s Rights
· Concussions and the NFL
Highlight or bold your topic selection in the list above, so your faculty member can easily see which topic you selected.
Locate 2 articles related to your selected topic from different databases, such as EBSCOhost and ProQuest, in the University Library. You may use the course-specific library resources found on the GEN/201 University Success page to locate your articles.
Complete the tables below for each article you have chosen. An example table is provided first.
Example
Article Information and Questions
Responses
Chosen topic
Social Media
Title of the article
“Facebook as a Platform of Social Interactions for Meaningful Learning”
Author(s) of the article
Jumaat, Nurul Farhana; Ahmad, Noriesah; Abu Samah, Norazrena; Ashari, Zakiah Mohamad; Ali, Dayana Farzeeha;
Abdullah, Abdul Halim
Date of publication
2019
Database where the article was found
EBSCOhost
Is the article credible? How do you know?
The article is credible because the six-authored article was peer-reviewed and published in a reputable publication: International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning.
Is the author biased? How do you know?
The authors were not biased, because they are not providing an opinion-based piece. They cite empirical evidence and research throughout.
Is the article relevant? Explain your response.
The article is relevant because it discusses issues related to the topic of social media, it was recently published, and the information presented in the article is accurate.
First Source
Article Information and Questions
Responses
Chosen topic
Title of the article
Author(s) of the article
Date of publication
Database where the article was found
Is the article credible? How do you know?
Is the author biased? How do you know?
Is the article relevant? Explain your response.
Second Source
Article Information and Questions
Responses
Chosen topic
Title of the article
Author(s) of the article
Date of publication
Database where the article was found
Is the article credible? How do you know?
Is the author biased? How do you know?
Is the article relevant? Explain your response.
Part 2: University Library Experience
Write a 150- to 200-word response to the following questions:
· Briefly describe your experience using the library databases to research your chosen topic. Discuss any challenges you encountered.
· What strategies will you use to find sources in the University Library going forward?
—
RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT RELEVANT DISRUPTION &
Disruption & Engagement (Assessment 1)
Week 5’s deadline
30 percent weighting
Review of a case study / visual and written presentation)
Learning Outcomes:
a. research, analyze, and critically evaluate effective disruption practices; b. critically evaluate global cultural dynamics that impact disruption and engagement; d. write concise, coherent, and informed arguments demonstrating how social, cultural, ethical, environmental, and sustainability theory applies to digital media practice; e. present a personal perspective on relevant disruption and global engagement practice.
Description:
Examine a case study of disruption that has been effectively implemented on a worldwide scale. With reference to theory, critically examine the effectiveness of the disruption as well as the project’s worldwide cultural influences and effects, including level of involvement, social, cultural, ethical, environmental, and sustainability factors (include citations using Harvard referencing). Prepare a self-reflective statement on your personal perspective on the project’s approach and outcomes as well. Make a visual presentation (minimum of 20 slides) as well as a written presentation (2,000 words).
Students must mention at least three external sources and use Harvard referencing to do so (in text citations and reference list). Include a complete bibliography as well.
Upload the final essay as a PDF file (Word converted to PDF) and the visual presentation as a second PDF file (PowerPoint converted to PDF) to Moodle for assessment.
Marking Rubrics & Criteria:
Criterion 1: Research and analysis breadth – 40%
Failure due to insufficient research and analysis
Pass: Basic but enough study and analysis.
Competent research and analysis are to be credited.
Distinction: Thorough and in-depth investigation and analysis
Highest Honors Excellent research and analysis
I RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT ASSESSMENT BRIEFS
RelevantDisruption&GlobalEngagement Unit is a file in the RelevantDisruption&GlobalEngagement Unit folder.
Perdis / Gemenis / Perdis / Gemenis / Perdis / Gemenis / Perdis The year is 2021, and the date is November 1st. Summary of the Final Assessment
Criteria 2: Critical assessment of influences and impact (20%)
Fail: A critical evaluation that isn’t comprehensive.
Pass: A basic but adequate critical examination.
Competent critical evaluation is to be credited.
Distinction: Comprehensive and in-depth critical analysis
Highest Honors Excellent critical assessment
Personal reflection (20%) is the third criterion.
Fail: A personal perspective that isn’t complete.
Credit: Competent personal reflection Pass: Adequate but basic personal reflection
Personal contemplation that is both comprehensive and detailed.
Highest Honors Personal contemplation that is outstanding and insightful
Criterion 4: Presentation quality (including referencing) – 20%
Failure: Incomplete presentation with no citations
Pass: Basic but adequate presentation, with several references
Credit: Excellent presentation with citations
Distinction: Detailed and comprehensive exposition, with exact references
Highest Honors Excellent presentation with more references
I RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT ASSESSMENT BRIEFS
RelevantDisruption&GlobalEngagement Unit is a file in the RelevantDisruption&GlobalEngagement Unit folder.
Perdis / Gemenis / Perdis / Gemenis / Perdis / Gemenis / Perdis Date: November 11, 2021 Status: Complete
The post In Part 2, you will write a brief 150- to 200-word response appeared first on Research Quora.
