Assignment Brief |UG | AY25-26
| Understanding the assignment brief | |
| Assignment brief to be discussed during an in-class session with students within the first 2 weeks of the unit. | 22/09/2025
Date this discussion is to take place |
| Uploaded screen/podcast explaining the assessment, the rubric and marking criteria. | Enter link on the BREO shell |
Assignment submission Marks and feedback
| Assessment deadline | Marks and feedback |
| To be submitted Before 10 a.m. on: | 20 working days after deadline (L3,4, 5,6 and 7) |
|
17/10/2025
|
15 working days after deadline (block delivery) |
|
14/11/2025
|
|
| Please note, for Exams the date is arranged centrally aligned to the academic calendar. Exams timetables will be released 6 weeks before the exam period. | |
| Key assignment details | |
| Unit title & code | BHS011-1 ; BHS017-1 ; BHS019-1 ; BHS020-1 ; BHS023-1 |
| Assignment number & title | Assignment 0 _ Formative Writing Assessment |
| Assignment type (including exams) | Formative Essay |
| Weighting of assignment | 0% |
| Size or length of assessment or exam duration | Up to 600 words |
| Use of generative AI | Not permitted |
| Use of self-plagiarism | Not permitted |
Do You Need Assignment of This Question
Completing Your Assignment
What am I required to do in this assignment? |
| This is a formative assessment that will not count towards your final unit mark; However, it will be graded according to University of Bedfordshire Life Sciences marking criteria and allow you to get feedback that will help you on future assignments.
In this formative assessment, you are asked to write a piece of formal academic writing on a topic provided that is related to your course area. Topics for each course area will be introduced in the tutorial and posted on BREO. To complete this assignment, you are asked to: 1. Use the library and other resources to find relevant information to your chosen topic. 2. Produce a piece of formal academic writing in your own words, using the knowledge gained from your reading and your own background knowledge of the subject, including references of your information sources. 3. Submit your essay to Studiosity for feedback on your writing style, grammar and structure, and improve your writing according to the feedback received. 4. Submit a single combined document to BREO before the deadline. This document must include: – The revised essay, improved based on Studiosity feedback – The original version of your essay, annotated or accompanied by the feedback received from Studiosity – Both parts should be clearly labelled and presented within one file. Your piece of writing should include the following components: • Introduction: Provide a short general introduction to your topic that should be easily understandable by your fellow students who may be less familiar with the topic than you are. This section should set the context and explain why the topic is relevant or important. • Technical content: This should be the main component of this section and is where you will explain some more detailed technical information about the topic. It is your choice as to what information to include, which can be any technical explanation relevant to the chosen topic. • References: Where appropriate, cite sources of information within the text. You should include a reference list at the end of your report that contains the full information for each of the citations within your text. In-text citations and the reference list should be formatted according to the UoB Harvard format. See A Guide to Referencing – lrweb.beds.ac.uk | University of Bedfordshire and https://citethemrightonline.com/ |
What do I need to do to pass? How do I achieve a good grade? |
| The formative assessment will be supported by the course lectures and tutorials, and will serve as a formative opportunity to receive feedback on your academic writing before the summative assessments. |
| The Unit Information Form states the Threshold Expectations that inform both you and markers what is the minimum needed to be demonstrated to pass the assessment. They should, therefore, answer the question “What do I need to do pass?”. During the assessment introductory session, you should be given the opportunity to check your understanding of the threshold statements and what you need to do to surpass them.
The assessment marking criteria listed below show how your work is assessed. The assessment criteria are informed by the unit’s learning outcomes and the assessment task. Carefully reading the assessment criteria should help you understand the aspects that will be used to judge your progress and achievement of the learning outcomes and offer guidance on “how do I achieve a good grade”. • Record and analyse data from an experiment using basic techniques • Evidence basic core skills required for work in the biosciences |
How will my assignment be marked? |
||||||
| Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations (see the Unit Information Form uploaded on BREO) and the specific marking criteria below (marking rubric). Please read carefully as they will help you prepare and evaluate your own work before you submit. They will also help you understand the grade and feedback received once marked. | ||||||
| 70%+ (1st Class) | 60-69% (2:1) | 50-59% (2:2) | 40-49%
(3rd Class) Threshold Standard |
30-39%
(Fail) |
0-29%
(Fail) |
|
| Understanding of topic area relevance of technical content. (50%)
|
The topic chosen has clear relevance to the course. The technical content is detailed and logical and demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of relevant scientific principles. | The topic chosen has clear relevance to the course. The technical content is adequate or acceptable and demonstrates very good understanding of relevant scientific principles. | The topic chosen is relevant to the course and the technical content is appropriate or inadequate. There is evidence of some general understanding of relevant scientific principles, but with some errors or omissions in the detail. | The topic chosen is loosely relevant to the course and there is some satisfactory technical content. There is evidence of some understanding of relevant scientific principles, but with many errors or omissions in the detail. | The topic chosen has limited relevance to the course with a weak technical content.
Understanding and analysis of scientific principles and knowledge base are poor |
The topic chosen has unclear or no relevance to the course with poor technical content. Demonstrate lack of understanding and analysis of scientific principles. |
| 70%+ (1st Class) | 60-69% (2:1) | 50-59% (2:2) | 40-49%
(3rd Class) Threshold Standard |
30-39%
(Fail) |
0-29%
(Fail) |
|
| Written expression and structure. (30%) | An excellent written expression that is clear, concise and fluent throughout. The structure of the piece is well planned and logical, enhancing its readability. | Strong written expression overall, though lacks some finesse. Structure of the piece is planned and logical with minor errors | Adequate written expression with some sections lacking clarity or containing awkward phrasing. The structure of the work is good, but planning could have been more thorough in parts. | Satisfactory written expression, though errors or awkward phrasing may hinder clarity. The structure of the work is satisfactory, and planning is weak.
|
Unclear or poorly constructed written expression. Structure is disjointed, showing little planning or logical flow. | Very poor written expression that
significantly impedes understanding. Structure is largely missing, highly disorganised, or completely ineffective. |
| Use of literature and referencing
(20%) |
A broad range of literature including primary sources is accessed. Correct UoB Harvard formatting of citations and reference list used throughout. | A very good range of literature is accessed including primary sources. In-text citations are used appropriately, with generally accurate referencing. Minor errors in formatting may be present. | A reasonable but relevant range of literature is accessed, including important primary sources. In-text citations are used but may be inconsistent or poorly integrated. UoB Harvard format is generally correct but contains several formatting or citation errors. | A broad range of literature is accessed, including primary sources, but many may be superficial or lacking suitable integration. Literature is referenced and arguments are loosely supported. Correct UoB Harvard formatting is attempted, though errors are common | Use of literature is limited and/or poorly chosen.. In-text citations are infrequent or incorrect. Referencing shows significant errors, and UoB Harvard formatting is not consistently followed. | Little or no relevant literature used. Intext citations are missing or entirely incorrect. Reference list is incomplete or absent. No adherence to UoB Harvard referencing format. |
Buy Answer of This Assessment & Raise Your Grades
Additional information
| How does this assignment relate to ‘my learning in this unit and help me develop knowledge and skills that I will need for my future? | ||||||||||||||||
| “How does this assignment relate to what we are doing in the scheduled sessions” – To be completed by the unit coordinator.
Within the University of Bedfordshire, graduate competencies refer to the skills, knowledge, attributes, and abilities that individuals are expected to possess upon completing their education at the graduate level. Our graduate competencies are the fundamental building blocks in preparing you for the future world of work. They form the foundation for learning outcomes within and beyond your course. They are relevant for every subject, and you can work towards them in different ways, so that you can attain and benefit from them even if you have lots going on outside university. These competencies will be integrated across your course and units. The table below indicates graduate competencies gained relevant to this assessment.
|
||||||||||||||||
| What should I be aware of when preparing my work? How and where should I submit my work? (May need WISEflow info for exams) | ||||||||||||||||
| To submit assignments at the University of Bedfordshire, you will typically use the BREO (Bedfordshire Resources for Education Online) platform. Within BREO, locate the specific assessment you need to submit, and then follow the instructions provided to upload your work.
The University has produced a guide that is designed to help you understand the processes we use to deliver and manage assessment-related processes, what support is available to you and how we agree and approve your results. It also provides you with an explanation of the codes we use when we issue results and transcripts. When submitting work for assessment, you must ensure that it is all your own work. Failure to do this could result in sanctions, including removal from your course. The Academic Integrity Resource (AIR) has been designed to introduce you to academic integrity and how to demonstrate this during your studies. Remember to use the self–help resources to support your skills in academic writing. You could also Improve your assignment grades by accessing free university support to develop a wide range of relevant and valuable academic skills. The University provides access to Studiosity that connects students with a team of writing specialists who are here to help you with writing and core skills – anytime, anywhere. Studiosity provides you with two online services: Writing Feedback and Connect Live. Their Writing Feedback gives feedback on referencing, choice of |
||||||||||||||||
| language, structure and spelling/grammar within 24 hours. If you are not sure how to use the feedback to enhance your work before making a final submission, you can arrange to discuss this with a member of the Study Hub team. Connect Live also offers live support in areas such as basic English, maths and stats, science and generic study skills. Both services are available 24/7, 365 days of the year, and you can access them for FREE via BREO.
Generative AI The writing should be completed by yourself and written in your own words; therefore, you should not use AI to generate your answers. The feedback from Studiosity feedback tool should be used critically to improve the essay. Any third-party sources (e.g., images or data from journal articles) should be cited and referenced using the correct UoB reference format. Self-Plagiarism Self-plagiarism is the copying of material from one assignment to another. It is not generally considered as an offence, but it is poor academic conduct. You should be producing new pieces of work for every assignment, with a view to improving each time. Whilst you may have completed other pieces of work with similar content, you are not permitted to reuse your existing work in the completion of this assignment. For exams, you should familiarise yourself with the guidance information available here: https://www.beds.ac.uk/exams/ Practice exams can be taken for all exam types before exams week. Please see section Prepare for your exam. |
||||||||||||||||
Are You Looking for Answer of This Assignment or Essay
The post Level 4 Skills Formative Writing Assessment Brief AY25-26 appeared first on Students Assignment Help UK.