MBI803 Research Methods MBI803 Assignment Brief 2026 Assignment | Weighting 40% Graduate Profile Outcomes (GPO) Learning Outcomes (LO) Assessment GPO1 Develop advanced knowledge and skills and apply these to solve business informatics problem
MBI803 Research Methods MBI803 Assignment Brief 2026 Assignment | Weighting 40%
Graduate Profile Outcomes (GPO) Learning Outcomes (LO) Assessment GPO1
Develop advanced knowledge and skills and apply these to solve business informatics problems.
LO3 Apply research skills in academic inquiry to develop well-formulated research questions that address challenges in professional practice within a specific context
Assessment Tasks
Task 1 (LO3): Papers Selection
Choose two recent research papers (in the past 3 years) from reputable, peer-reviewed journals. One paper should be focused on healthcare, and the other should be from a different academic or professional context (e.g., education, business, social sciences).
- Both papers must have been published within the last three years.
- Only use papers from established, peer-reviewed journals. Platforms such as ResearchGate and arXiv are not acceptable for citation.
- Provide full citations in APA 7th edition format for each paper.
Task 2 (LO3): Reading and Analysis
Thoroughly read both selected papers to understand the research topic, methodology, and key findings.
- Provide an overview of the research topic, the methodology used (e.g., survey, case study, experiment), and summarise the key findings presented by the authors.
Task 3 (LO3): Identifying Research Gaps
Examine the limitations of each paper or other areas where the authors acknowledge the need for further research.
- Identify unanswered questions or unresolved challenges within the research area.
- Consider whether the methodology could be extended to explore new aspects of the problem.
- Reflect on limitations regarding the generalisability of the findings due to specific contexts or technologies used.
Task 4 (LO3): Formulating Research Questions
Based on the identified research gaps, create two well-formulated research questions for each paper. Ensure the questions are:
- Specific: Focused on a narrow and clear aspect of the broader research topic.
- Feasible: Researchable within the time, resource, and methodological constraints.
- Significant: Capable of contributing valuable knowledge to the field.
Task 5 (LO3): Critical Reflection
For each selected paper:
- Explain how having a well-defined, focused research question can improve the effectiveness of research or professional practice.
- Discuss the potential negative consequences of poorly formulated research questions in each respective context.
Need Help With MBI803 Research Methods Assignment Brief 2026 | Yoobee College?
Hire NZ Native Experts 24/7.
Hire Expert
Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcome and GPOs Mapping
| LO | GPO | Task | Task Component | Weighting |
| LO3
Critically evaluate the importance of developing well-formulated research questions in different contexts of academic inquiry or professional practice.
|
GPO1 | Task1: Paper Selection | Task 1: Select reliable sources | 5% |
| Task 1: Select recent journals | 5% | |||
| Task 2:
Reading and Analysis
|
Task 2: Provide an overview of each topic and methodology | 10% | ||
| Task 2: Summarise key findings in each paper | 10% | |||
| Task 3:
Identifying Research Gaps |
Task 3: Identify unanswered questions or unresolved challenges within the research area | 10% | ||
| Task 3: Reflect on limitations regarding the generalisability of the findings | 10% | |||
| Task 4:
Formulating Research Questions |
Task 4: Create two well-formulated research questions for first paper | 15% | ||
| Task 4: Create two well-formulated research questions for the second paper | 15% | |||
| Task 5: Critical Reflection | Task 5: Explain how having a well-defined research question can improve the effectiveness of research or professional practice | 10% | ||
| Task5: Discuss the potential negative consequences of poorly formulated research questions in each respective context | 10% | |||
| 100% | ||||
MBI803 Assignment Marking Rubric
To pass this assessment, you must meet the requirements of each of the learning outcome (irrespective of the grade awarded).
| Criteria & Weighting | E (0-39) % | D (40-49) % | C-, C, C+ (5064) % | B-, B, B+ (6579) % | A-, A, A+ (80-100) % | |
| Paper Selection (LO3) |
10% | Did not select relevant papers or journals. | Relevant paper but not reliable source. | Selected papers from somewhat relevant journals. |
Selected relevant research paper from reputable journals, but papers may not have been the most recent. | Demonstrated a strong understanding of relevant journals and selected highly pertinent papers. |
| Reading and Analysis (LO3) |
20% | Did not provide an overview or analysis of the papers. | Overviews and analysis were unclear or inaccurate. | Provided basic overviews of the papers but lacked details on methodologie s or findings. | Provided clear overviews of the papers but lacked analysis of methodologies and findings. |
Demonstrated a deep understanding of the papers’ content. Insightful analysis and comprehensive titles, authors, publication details, research topics, methodologies, and key findings. |
| Identifying Research Gaps (LO3) |
20% | Did not identify any clear research gaps. | Identified some potential gaps, but explanations were unclear or limited. |
Identified some research gaps, but explanations lacked depth or focus. |
Identified research gaps and explained their significance very well. | Demonstrated strong ability to critically analyse limitations. Clearly identified and explained at least two significant limitations or unanswered questions within each of the research contexts. |
| Formulating Research Questions (LO3) |
30% | Did not formulate any research question or the questions were irrelevant to the paper. |
Formulated two research questions for each paper, but they were unclear, unfocused, or not clearly linked to the identified gaps. | Formulated two research questions for each paper, but they may have lacked some focus or justification. | Formulated two well-defined and welljustified research questions for each paper that clearly address the identified gaps. | Formulated two well-defined research questions for each paper that were: – Specific & focused – Feasible – Significant to the field. |
| Critical Reflection (LO3) |
20% | Lacks explanation of how a well-defined a research question improves research effectiveness or how poorly formulated questions negatively impacts practice. |
Basic explanation of the importance of a well- defined research question, but the analysis is weak. |
Explanation of how a welldefined, focused research question improves research or professional practice is provided but negative consequences of poorly formulated questions lacks depth or critical insight. |
Clear explanation of how a wellformulated research question enhances research or professional practice and the analysis of the potential negative consequences of poorly formulated research questions is well-developed and thoughtful. |
Demonstrated deep understanding of how a wellformulated research question improves research effectiveness or professional practice, with wellexplained examples. The discussion of the negative consequences of poorly formulated questions is thorough, insightful, and supported by relevant evidence from the selected papers. The response is clear, coherent, and excellently written, with no errors in logic or language. |