Part A (1,400 words) Conduct a research in the internet to find the following case: LISBETH ENTERPRISES LIMITED V MANDY LUK IN THE COURT OF FINAL; APPEAL IN THE YEAR 2005. Please note the date of hearing of the case was in 2006. Note down: (a) The general area of law involved in the case; (10 marks) (b) The specific issue or issues in the cases; An issue is a legal question the court must answer as part of the process of deciding

Part A (1,400 words) Conduct a research in the internet to find the following case: LISBETH ENTERPRISES LIMITED V MANDY LUK IN THE COURT OF FINAL; APPEAL IN THE YEAR 2005. Please note the date of hearing of the case was in 2006. Note down:
(a) The general area of law involved in the case; (10 marks)
(b) The specific issue or issues in the cases; An issue is a legal question the court must answer as part of the process of deciding the case;(10 marks)
(c) The argument of the appellant and the respondent; (10 marks)
(d) The legislative intention behind the employer ordinance ; (5marks)
(e) Which approach of interpretation of legislation did the courts ( including the court of final appeal, court of appeal and court of first instance ) use in this case (In this part, you have to compare and contrast the various approached of interpretation of legislation used by the judges in common law jurisdiction and find the judgements in the court of appeal and the court of first instance); (30 marks)
(f) The outcome of the case; (5marks)
Part B(600 words) Advocates (whether solicitors or barristers) have for a long time been immune from actions in negligence for the way they conduct a case in court.Critically discuss the arguments for and against immunity.