“The doctrine of stare decisis is a myth.” Critically analyze this statement in the light of Lord Atkin`s judgement in Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] UKHL 100
250 words for IT IS a myth.
*250 words for it is NOT a myth.
*100 words for own opinion
*Please use CASES to prove. No need to write introduction.
Stare Decisis Name Institution Stare Decisis Stare Decisis is a Myth Stare Decisis offers the concept of precedent in that once an issue that has previously been brought to court and a decision reached, then generally, all courts should adhere to the previous ruling. However, this is a myth because stare decisis is not universally true in all instances. For example, judges from a court of appeal even when they agree to the result of the case, they may announce varying ratios or reasons which can be difficult to reconcile. Further, a judgment may comprise of reasons, but with no statement of even one proposition that
The post Stare Decisis Name Institution Stare Decisis Stare Decisis is a Myth Stare Decisis offers the concept of precedent in that once an issue that has previously been brought to court and a decision reached, then generally, all courts should adhere to the previous ruling. However, this is a myth because stare decisis is not univ appeared first on My Academic Papers.
