The Assignment for this week is to provide you an opportunity to analyze one of five case studies provided.  These case studies involve common pregnancy and psychosocial issues encountered in advanced nursing primary care

This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyzes
subjective and objective data and outlines applicable diagnostic tests
related to case studies.

30 to
>26.7 ptsExcellentThe
response provides clear, complete, and comprehensive descriptions of
subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining all diagnostic
tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

26.7 to
>23.7 ptsGoodThe
response provides clear, complete partial descriptions of the components of
the subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining most of the
diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

23.7 to
>20.7 ptsFairThe
response provides some components of the subjective and objective case data,
but they are incomplete, vague or inaccurate, outlining some of the
diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

20.7 to
>0 ptsPoorThe response provides unclear or
incomplete components of subjective and objective case data. The diagnostic
tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions are missing,
incorrect, or inappropriately applied.

30 pts

This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies
differential diagnoses related to case studies.

30 to
>26.76 ptsExcellentThe
response contains at least 3 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable
to the case.

26.76 to
>23.7 ptsGoodThe
response contains at least 2 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable
to the case.

23.7 to
>20.7 ptsFairThe
response contains at least 1 differential diagnosis relevant and applicable
to the case.

20.7 to
>0 ptsPoorThe response contains few or no
differential diagnoses and/or diagnoses are not relevant and applicable to
the case.

30 pts

This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormulates
a treatment plan related to case studies based on scientific rationale,
evidence- based standards of care, and practice guidelines. Integrates
ethical, psychological, physical, financial issues and Social Determinants of
Health in plan.

30 to
>26.76 ptsExcellentFormulates
a thorough treatment plan including explanations of appropriate diagnostic
tests and treatment options. Fully incorporates syntheses representative of
knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources,
with no less than 75% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and
breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or
professional practice guidelines.

26.76 to
>23.7 ptsGoodFormulates
a partially complete treatment plan including partial explanations of
appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Somewhat incorporates
syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the
module and current credible sources with no less than 50% of the treatment
plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current
peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

23.7 to
>20.7 ptsFairFormulates
a minimally complete treatment plan including incomplete or vague
explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Lacking
in synthesis of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and
current credible sources. Supported by at least 2 current peer- reviewed,
references or professional practice guidelines.

20.7 to
>0 ptsPoorFormulates a treatment plan that
contains incomplete explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and
treatment options and/ or explanations are missing. Lacks synthesis gained
from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by
1 or no current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice
guidelines.

30 pts

This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten
Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct
grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to
>4.45 ptsExcellentUses
correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4.45 to
>3.95 ptsGoodContains
a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.95 to
>3.45 ptsFairContains
several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.45 to
>0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s
understanding.

5 pts

This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten
Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title
page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers,
parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to
>4.45 ptsExcellentUses
correct APA format with no errors.

4.45 to
>3.95 ptsGoodContains
a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.95 to
>3.45 ptsFairContains
several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3.45 to
>0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format
errors.

5 pts